Article Detailing The Article 21 Of The Indian Constituion.

“No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to a procedure established by law.”

According to Bhagwati, J., Article 21 “embodies a constitutional value of supreme importance in a democratic society.” Iyer, J., has characterized Article 21 as “the procedural magna carta protective of life and liberty.

This right has been held to be the core of the Constitution and is the most organic and progressive provision in our living constitution, the foundation of our laws.

Article 21 shelters two rights:

1. Right to life.
2. Right to personal liberty.

Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950, states, “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” ‘Life’ in Article 21 of the Constitution is not merely the physical act of breathing. It has a broader meaning, including the right to live with human dignity, livelihood, health, pollution-free air, etc.

In the case of Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh[i], the Supreme Court quoted and held that The term “life” here used something more than mere animal existence. The inhibition against its deprivation extends to all those limbs and faculties by which life is enjoyed. The provision equally prohibits the mutilation of the body by amputation of an armored leg, the pulling out of an eye, or the destruction of any other organ of the body through which the soul communicates with the outer world. “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.”

Out of the six fundamental rights provided to Indian citizens, the right to life and personal liberty has been considered one of the rights that enable citizens to live freely and without interference. Although this right was not interpreted to the fullest, with judicial developments, the ambit of this right has amplified and is still on the path of intensification.

This right of the Constitution provided to the citizens of India is not only considered a fundamental right but a right by being human, enabling citizens to go through their lives, which is different from mere animal existence.

The words’ liberty’ first came up for contemplation in the case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras.

Interpretation of the Court: The Supreme Court illuminated the meaning and scope of ‘personal liberty’ with a very literal and narrow view. The term’ liberty’ has a vast meaning, but when it is qualified by the word ‘personal’, the spectrum of the concept of liberty diminishes; therefore, it does not include all that is implied in the term ‘liberty’.

The Supreme Court held that personal liberty includes nothing more than physical freedom of body, i.e. freedom from arrest and detention from false imprisonment or wrongful confinement.

The SC also interpreted the word ‘law’ as ‘state-made law’ and rejected the petitioner’s contention. Fazal Ali J., however, held a demurring view and broadly defined the words’ liberty’ as consisting of freedom of movement. From time to time, The Supreme Court of India has added Various dimensions to Article 21.

Following is the list of these:-

1. A.K. Gopalan V State of Madras: procedure established by law
2. Right to have fair procedure- Maneka Gandhi V U.O.I.
3. Right to Legal Aid- Hussainara v Home Sec, Bihar
4. Right to Public Trial- Vineet Narain V U.O.I.
5. Right to go abroad- Satwant Singh Sawhney v. Assistant Passport Officer, New Delhi, Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
6. Right to privacy- Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.
7. Right against solitary confinement Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
8. Right against handcuffing Prem Shankar v. Delhi Administration
9. Right to Medical Care- Parmananda Katara v. Union of India
10. Right to Health- Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India
11. Right to Social Security and Protection of Family- L.I.C. of India v. Consumer Education and Research Centre
12. Right to Shelter- Chameli Singh v. State of U.P.
13. Right To Livelihood- D.T.C. v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress
14. Right to Reputation- D.F. Marion v. Minnie Davis
15. Right Against Sexual Harassment at Workplace- Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan
16. Right To Live with Human Dignity- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi
17. Right against Bar Fetters- Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration-
18. Right to Write a Book- State of Maharashtra v. Prabhakar Pandurang
19. Right against Delayed Execution: Sher Singh v. State of Punjab
20. Right against Public Hanging: Attorney General of India v. Lachma Devi
21. Death by Hanging not Violative of Article 21- Deena v. Union of India
22. Right to Bail.- Babu Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
23. Right to Fair Trial- Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat
24. Right to Speedy Trial- Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar.
25. Right to Free Legal Aid & Right to Appeal- M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
26. Right against Illegal Detention- Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
27. Disclosure of Dreadful Diseases- Mr. X v. Hospital Z
28. Tapping of Telephone- PUCL v. Union of India
29. Right Against Noise Pollution- In Re: Noise Pollution
30. Murli S. Deora v. Union of India- smoking in public place
31. Right to get Pollution Free Water and Air- Subhas Kumar v. State of Bihar.
32. Euthanasia and Right to Life- Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab
33. Right to Work- Olga tells v B.M.C.
34. Right to Marriage- Mr. X vs. Hospital
35. Right to Food- PUCL v U.O.I.
36. Right to Legal Aid- Sheela Barse v U.O.I.
37. Right to Education- Mohini Jain v state of Karnataka
38. Right, to have a clean environment- MC Mehta v U.O.I.
39. Right to have a shelter- Chameli v State
40. Right to receive compensation – Rudal Shah v state of Bihar.

You may contact me for legal consultation or advice by visiting Contact Us