WE PROVIDE CUSTOMIZED DRAFTING SERVICES FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. IF YOU ARE IN REQUIREMENT OF THE SAME, YOU CAN CONTACT US USING CONTACT ME PAGE
Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.
CONSULTATION
WE PROVIDE CUSTOMIZED DRAFTING SERVICES FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. IF YOU ARE IN REQUIREMENT OF THE SAME, YOU CAN CONTACT US USING CONTACT ME PAGE
WE PROVIDE CUSTOMIZED DRAFTING SERVICES FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. IF YOU ARE IN REQUIREMENT OF THE SAME, YOU CAN CONTACT US USING CONTACT ME PAGE
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: G.S. Singhvi, Asok Kumar Ganguly Inst.Of Chartered Accountants Of … vs Vimal Kumar Surana & Anr on 1 December, 2010 Law Point: Matters can be remitted back to lower courts for fresh consideration in the interest of justice. JUDGEMENT 1. Leave granted. 2. The question which arises […]
Court: High Court Of Allahabad Bench: JUSTICE A. Mateen Syed Nazim Husain Vs. The Additional Principal Judge Family Court & another on 9.1.2003 Law Point: Perjury application must be decided first before proceeding with the case. JUDGEMENT Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. Since a very trivial point is involved I propose […]
Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Sanjiv Khanna Rajkumar Indoria Vs. Nct Of Delhi, New Delhi on 18 August, 2010 Law Point: Every allegations do not justify initiation of prosecution under 340 CRPC. Perjury explained JUDGEMENT 1. The writ petition filed by the petitioner for police protection to him and his family members […]
Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: JUSTICE A.K. Roopanwal Garima Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 January 2010 Mr. Gopal Narain Aggarwal, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Narinder Kaushik, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Wife fined 10,000 for false affidavit and perjury proceedings initiated JUDGEMENT In this petition orders dated 15.7.09 and 7.10.09 passed by the Principal Judge, Family […]
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: C.K. Thakker, D.K. Jain Pankaj Kumar vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 11 July, 2008 Law Point: Right to speedy trial in all criminal persecutions is an inalienable right under Article 21 of the Constitution. JUDGEMENT Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises from the final judgment and order […]
Court: Central Information Commission Dr.Mahesh Hasija vs Cbdt on 30 October, 2013 Law Point: Broad outcome of the TEP to be provided to appellant once the enquiry has been completed JUDGEMENT Vide RTI dt 1.4.13, appellant had sought information on 4 points relating to TEP dt 29.8.11 against Shri […]
Court: Central Information Commission Mr.Juhi Jadli vs CBDT on 3 June, 2013 Law Point: Spouse Not a Third Party if Marriage Subsists JUDGEMENT Heard today dated 03.06.2013. Appellant not present. The public authority is represented by Shri S.S. Chahal, ITO Ward 1(4), Nodia. 2. By RTI application dated 07.09.2011, the appellant had […]