Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.
CONSULTATION
Court: HIGH COURT OF DELHI Bench: JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR Rohit Chauhan vs State Nct Of Delhi on 22 May, 2013 Law Point: Prosecutrix did not appear to be such vulnerable lady that she would not raise her voice on being immensely exploited over such long period of time. AB granted. JUDGEMENT […]
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: B.S. Chauhan, Dipak Misra Deepak Gulati vs State Of Haryana on 20 May, 2013 Law Point: Physical relationship between parties with consent of prosecutrix, not tantamount to committing rape. Allegation of “false promise of marriage” raised by prosecutrix is of no consequence JUDGEMENT 1. This […]
Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P.GARG Gaurav Maggo vs The State Of Nct, Delhi on 29 May, 2015 Law Point: Prosecutrix fails to establish promise to marry. Physical relations with consent. Appellants conduct is unfair/unreasonable but not amounting to Rape JUDGEMENT 1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment […]
Court: Heigh Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Pradeep Nandrajog Alok Kumar Jain vs Purnima Jain on 17-04-2007 Law Point: Factors for awarding Interim Maintenace under section 24 Hindu Marriage Act JUDGEMENT 1. Alok Kumar Jain was married to Ms.Purnima Jain at New Delhi. They were blessed with 2 daughters. 2. Alok Kumar Jain was employed […]
Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: Shiv Narayan Dhingra Sadhu Ram @ Dalip vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 10 September, 2010 Mr. Arun Rathee and Mr. Durgesh Pandey, Adv. For the appellant. Mr. Sunil Sharma. APP For the respondent. Law Point: Caught in Extra Martial Affair, wife slapped rape case JUDGEMENT 1. This appeal has been preferred […]
Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR Rajesh @ Bobby vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 17 May, 2010 Mr.B.K. Sharma, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP For the respondent. Law Point: Testimony of the prosecutrix is not the gospel truth on which implicit reliance can be blindly placed. No medical, contradictory account of incidence by prosecutix JUDGEMENT […]