Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

rape

Malti Chauhan Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Indermeet Kaur Malti Chauhan Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors. On 04.12.2015 Law Point: Attempt to rape. Star witness is the prosecutrix herself – MLC of the victim and the FSL report do not support the version of the prosecution – Testimony of the prosecutrix […]

Read More

Man Mohan and Ors. Vs. State (GNCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Indermeet Kaur Man Mohan and Ors. Vs. State (GNCT of Delhi) On 14.12.2015 Law Point: Relationship between prosecutrix and Appellant was a consent relationship – Victim was an adult – There was no pressure or coercion upon victim – She had several opportunities to disclose facts – She did […]

Read More

Raj Kishore @ Raj Kumar Vs. State (GNCT Of Delhi)

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Raj Kishore @ Raj Kumar Vs. State (GNCT Of Delhi) On 5 January 2016 Law Point: Wrongful Confinement — Outraging modesty of woman — Rape. No external injuries found on body of prosecutrix ruling out ‘force’ used by accused to ravish her — FSL reports absolve accused […]

Read More

State of Karnataka Vs. F. Nataraj

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICE Pinaki Chandra Ghose and R.K. Agrawal State of Karnataka Vs. F. Nataraj On 07 October 2015 Law Point: The gaps in the evidences of the prosecutrix and the medical officer make it highly improbable that sexual intercourse took place. It would be erroneous to rely upon such discrepant […]

Read More

Raghuvinder Harna Vs. State Of NCT Of Delhi

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Raghuvinder Harna Vs. State Of NCT Of Delhi On 5 November 2015 Law Point: Physical relations were outcome of free consent of appellant and prosecutrix and she was willing and consenting party — It did not attract Section 376, IPC.     JUDGEMENT   1. Aggrieved by […]

Read More

Mohit Yadav Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Mohit Yadav Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) On 09 October 2015 Law Point: Status report reveals that the petitioner and the prosecitrix were acquainted with each other – Physical relations were established on several occasions between them. The prosecutrix is married and a major lady. […]

Read More

Delhi HC Lays Down Exhaustive Directions and Guidelines for POCSO Trial

Delhi High Court Justice Gita Mittal   Virender vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi on 18 September, 2009   Law Point: Gaps in evidence, Several discrepencies in evidence   Appellant(s) Virender, through Mr. S.B. Dandapani, ADV.   Respondent(s) The State of NCT of Delhi   through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the state CORAM: […]

Read More

Vikul Bakshi Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Vikul Bakshi Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi) On 19 January 2016 Law Point: The petitioner has joined investigation. The parties were acquainted with each other before the incident. Physical relation between the two took place allegedly on pretext of marriage. Petitioner is granted anticipatory bail.   […]

Read More

Tula Ram Rai Vs. State of Sikkim

Court: Sikkim High Court Bench: JUSTICE Meenakshi Madan Rai Tula Ram Rai Vs. State of Sikkim On 08 MAY 2017 Law Point: Existence of preponderance of probability – Not sufficient to establish prosecution case, which must be proved beyond all reasonable doubt, which prosecution failed – Accused Acquitted.     JUDGEMENT   1. The Appellant […]

Read More

Kapil Dev Vs. State Of H.P.

Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE Mr. Thakur Kapil Dev vs State Of H.P. On 21 June 2017 Law Point: Abduction and Rape – Sexual intercourse on pretext of marriage – Charge stands belied when prosecutrix permitted accused to sexually access her even when accused resiled from his promise and there is delay in […]

Read More