Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

no maintenance to wife

Sharif Ahmed Vs. Imaman Bi

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE U.L. Bhat Sharif Ahmed Vs. Imaman Bi On 20 February 1995 Law Point: Wife has no excuse that her salary was not sufficient for her expenses. Maintenance denied to wife. JUDGEMENT 1. Revision petitioner is the husband of the respondent. They were married in 1976 and a son […]

Read More

Jeevan Singh Vs. Sangeeta Bai

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE N.K. Gupta Jeevan Singh Vs. Sangeeta Bai On 7 October 2013 Law Point: Applicant was neither valid wife of non-applicant, nor she had any reason to live away from her husband, to get any maintenance from her husband — She was not ousted but she herself left house […]

Read More

Saroj Bala @ Geeta Vs. Ashok Kumar Kalyan

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE Paramjeet Singh Saroj Bala @ Geeta Vs. Ashok Kumar Kalyan On 5 February 2013 Law Point: Divorce by mutual consent — Wife residing separately by mutual consent and accepted lump sum amount of maintenance as full and final settlement as paid — Wife not entitled to maintenance. […]

Read More

Amarendra Nath Bagui Vs. Gouri Rani Bagui And Another

Court: Calcutta High Court Bench: JUSTICE J.N. Hore Amarendra Nath Bagui Vs. Gouri Rani Bagui And Another On 29 June 1990 Law Point: When a wife lives separately by mutual consent she cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. JUDGEMENT 1. The present Revisional Application at the instance of the husband is directed […]

Read More

Abdul Malik Vs. Nashim Akhtar

Court: Gauhati High Court Bench: JUSTICE Amitava Roy Abdul Malik Vs. Nashim Akhtar On 4 December 2008 Law Point: Intention and element of permanence construed to be determining factors to identify place to be one of residence of person for purpose of Section 126 CPC. JUDGEMENT 1. The order dated 14.6.2007 and 6.9.2007 passed by […]

Read More

Kamlesh Vs. Sitaram

Court: Rajasthan High Court Bench: JUSTICE Ashok Parihar Kamlesh Vs. Sitaram 27 July 2004 Law Point: Wife not able to maintain herself : Word “maintain” used under Section 125, Criminal Procedure Code to be taken in broader sense that petitioner should be able to maintain herself decently to live comfortable life, not necessary luxurious life […]

Read More

Saju Sasidharan Vs. Dhanya & Anr.

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICES K.T. Sankaran & M.L. Joseph Francis Saju Sasidharan Vs. Dhanya & Anr. on 7 August 2012 Law Point: Maintenance pendente lite — Oral request for such relief cannot be entertained by Family Court — Order passed by Family Court granting interim maintenance set aside. JUDGEMENT 1. The question involved […]

Read More

Palaniammal Vs. K. Chinnusamy

Court: Madras High Court Bench: JUSTICE Janarthanam Palaniammal vs K. Chinnusamy on 27 August 1994 Law Point: Lump-sum payment evidenced by a deed. Husband’s obligation to maintain discharged. JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner is the wife, while the respondent is the husband. The wife instituted proceedings claiming maintenance for herself under Section 125 of the Code […]

Read More

Alora Sundaran Vs. Mammali Sumathi & Anr.

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE R. Basant Alora Sundaran Vs. Mammali Sumathi & Anr. On 6 July 2006 Law Point: Magistrate has power to sentence Husband for not more than 1 month if there is default in payment of maintenance. JUDGEMENT 1. Does the decision in Shahada Khatoon v. Amjad Ali, I (2000) DMC […]

Read More

P.M. Devassia Vs. Ancy & Ors.

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE K.A. Abdul Gafoor P.m. Devassia Vs. Ancy & Ors. On 26 October 2006 Law Point: Civil Court liable to take into account order of maintenance competent to pass under Section 125, Cr.P.C. while considering claim for maintenance in civil suit. JUDGEMENT 1. The father is assailing the decree granting […]

Read More