Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

maintenance

Murlidhar Chintaman Waghmare Vs. Pratibha Murlidhar Waghmare And Another

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE B.G. Kolse Patil Murlidhar Chintaman Waghmare Vs. Pratibha Murlidhar Waghmare And Another Law Point: Wife’s suit for maintenance under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act was dismissed on merits. Her subsequent application under Section 125 Cr.PC liable to be dismissed. JUDGEMENT 1. This is a Criminal Application filed by the […]

Read More

Anita Vs. Rati Ram Chauhan

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Mukta Gupta Anita Vs. Rati Ram Chauhan On 4 November 2011 Law Point: Maintenance — Marriage dissolved on ground of cruelty — Finding of civil Court in matrimonial proceeding is binding on criminal Court — Criminal Court is not entitled to question the correctness or validity of civil Court […]

Read More

Ram Prasanna Dash Vs. Bhabani Devi

Court: Orissa High Court Bench: JUSTICE D.P. Mohapatra Ram Prasanna Dash Vs. Bhabani Devi Law Point: Wife not entitled to maintenance under section 125 of Crpc when Civil Court has granted a decree declaring the marriage to be null and void. JUDGEMENT 1. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Sub-divisional Judl. Magistrate, […]

Read More

Saroj Bala @ Geeta Vs. Ashok Kumar Kalyan

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE Paramjeet Singh Saroj Bala @ Geeta Vs. Ashok Kumar Kalyan On 5 February 2013 Law Point: Divorce by mutual consent — Wife residing separately by mutual consent and accepted lump sum amount of maintenance as full and final settlement as paid — Wife not entitled to maintenance. […]

Read More

V.K.V. Sarma Vs. Indra Sarma

Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: JUSTICE V. Jagannathan V.K.V. Sarma Vs. Indra Sarma On 12 August 2011 Law Point: ‘Relationship in nature of marriage’ and ‘Domestic relationship’ defined. Maintenance not allowed. JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner is before this Court aggrieved by the Trial Court allowing the application filed by the respondent under Section 12 of […]

Read More

Kamla Vs. State Of Uttarakhand & Anr.

Court: Uttarakhand High Court Bench: JUSTICE Servesh Kumar Gupta Kamla Vs. State Of Uttarakhand & Anr. On 6 January 2012 Law Point: Applicant failed to prove she is legally wedded wife. She might be living with him as man and woman, her status is that of concubine or having a live-in relationship. Not granted maintenance. […]

Read More

L. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. L. Ramalakshumma & Anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICES N.Y. Hanumanthappa & V. Bhaskara Rao L. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. L. Ramalakshumma & Anr. Law Point: Determination of quantum of maintenance. JUDGEMENT 1. This is a reference by our learned Brother B.S.A. Swamy, J., seeking an authoritative pronouncement on the question whether the wife who deserted her husband […]

Read More

Ram Kishore & Anr. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Anr.

Court: Rajasthan High Court Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Kumar Garg Ram Kishore & Anr. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. On 17 May 2004 Law Point: Maintenance : Perjury : False affidavit by wife : Cognizance of offence : Scope of Sections 195 and 340, Cr.P.C. : Magistrate before whom claim filed himself took cognizance of […]

Read More

Gulab Khan Vs. Nairun Nisha

Court: Jharkhand High Court Bench: JUSTICE D.K. Sinha Gulab Khan Vs. Nairun Nisha On 19 March 2010 Law Point: Grant of maintenance without considering paying capacity of Husband — Impugned order is erroneous. JUDGEMENT 1. This criminal revision is directed against the order impugned passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Lohardaga in a proceeding […]

Read More

Binda Devi Vs. Dabboo Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Pratibha Rani Binda Devi Vs. Dabboo Yadav @ Sanjeev Yadav On 7 September 2016 Law Point: Section 125 — Maintenance — Relationship between parties. JUDGEMENT 1. For the reasons stated in the application 395 days delay in filing and 395 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. 2. Application […]

Read More