Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

judgement

Demand for Domestic Expenses in Exigency is not Dowry

Supreme Court of India Appeal (crl.) 1613 of 2005 Bench: G.P. MATHUR & R.V. RAVEENDRAN Appasaheb And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 January, 2007 Law Point: Demand for Domestic Expenses is not dowry u/s 304B JUDGEMENT This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23.2.2005 of Bombay […]

Read More

Sunita Arya, W/O Surendra Dev Vs. Surendra Dev

Court: HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND First Appeal No.76 of 2008 Bench: Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. and Hon’ble Nirmal Yadav, J. Sunita Arya, W/O Surendra Dev vs Surendra Dev on 26 August, 2010 Shri D.K. Sharma, Adv. For the appellant. Shri M.K. Ray, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Marriage Irretrievably broken down, husband granted divorce JUDGEMENT This appeal, preferred under section 19 […]

Read More

Mrs. Flora Bose Vs. Suproti Bose

Court: HIGH COURT OF DELHI Bench: JUSTICE ARUNA SURESH Mrs. Flora Bose vs Suproti Bose on 20 August, 2010 Mr. Sunil Mittal, Adv. For the appellant. Nemo. For the respondent. Law Point: 2 or 3 incidences sufficient for Divorce on ground of cruelty JUDGEMENT 1. Under challenge in this appeal is the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge dated 8th […]

Read More

Once Children Attains Majority, Provisions of CrPC 125 cease

Supreme Court of India Amrendra Kumar Paul vs Maya Paul & Ors on 4 August, 2009 Bench: S.B. Sinha, Cyriac Joseph Law Point: Once children attained majority, provisions of CrPC 125 cease Author: S Sinha Appellant(s) Amarendra Kumar Paul Respondent(s) Maya Paul & Ors. JUDGEMENT 1. Leave granted. 2. Appellants herein are aggrieved by and […]

Read More

Filing False Criminal Complaint is Matrimonial Cruelty Fit for Divorce

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEAL No. 1213 OF 2006 K.SRINIVAS vs K. SUNITA Law Point: Filing a False Criminal Complaint by Either Spouse Would Constitute Matrimonial Cruelty and Entitle the Other Spouse to Claim a Divorce JUDGEMENT VIKRAMAJIT SEN,J. 1. In this Appeal, counsel for the Appellant has sought to draw our attention to […]

Read More

Marriage Annulled for Concealment of Age and Medical History by Wife

Punjab and Haryana High Court Som Dutt vs Raj Kumari on 7 October, 1985 Bench: S Sodhi Equivalent citations: AIR 1986 P H 191 Law Point: Concealment of wife’s age and medical history JUDGMENT 1. A short stay together and long continuing litigation thereafter is what marks the marriage here. It was a marriage conceived […]

Read More

Madhya Pradesh High Court Defines Desertion and How to Prove it

Madhya Pradesh High Court Satish Kumar vs Shashi Prabha on 12 November, 1992 Bench: D Dharamadhikari Equivalent citations: II (1994) DMC 406 Law Point: Test of resonableness – Desertion, Conduct of Wife JUDGMENT D.M. Dharamadhikari, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the husband against the order dated 23-1-1991 of the Trial Court refusing […]

Read More

Misrepresentation in Matrimonial Advertisement Annulment Granted

Punjab-Haryana High Court Sh. Brijinder Bir Singh vs Mst. Vinod Alias Parminder on 6 May, 1994 Bench: N Sodhi Equivalent citations: AIR 1995 P H 42, I (1995) DMC 334 Law Point: Misrepresentation in matrimonial advertisement JUDGMENT 1. This first appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated August 23, 1991 passed by the […]

Read More

Mother Seeking Maintenance Not Fit to be Guardian Custody to Father

Allahabad High Court Master Zubeen vs Principal Judge, Family Court, … on 7 May, 1993 Bench: K Bhargava Equivalent citations: AIR 1994 All 147 Law Point: Mother unable to maintain herself seeking maintenance from husband, custody of child to remain with Father ORDER 1. This is a habeas corpus petition under Art. 226 of the […]

Read More

Mother is to be preferred than father in Child Custody is not correct view

Court: Supreme Court of India Kumar V. Jahgirdar vs Chethana Ramatheertha on 29 January, 2004 Justice Shivaraj V. Patil, D.M. Dharmadhikari. Law Point: Mother is to be preferred than father is not correct view Appellant(s) Kumar V. Jahgirdar Respondent(s) Chethana Ramatheertha JUDGMENT Dharmadhikari J. In these two appeals, the subject matter of dispute between the […]

Read More