Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

judgement

Delhi HC Lays Down Exhaustive Directions and Guidelines for POCSO Trial

Delhi High Court Justice Gita Mittal   Virender vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi on 18 September, 2009   Law Point: Gaps in evidence, Several discrepencies in evidence   Appellant(s) Virender, through Mr. S.B. Dandapani, ADV.   Respondent(s) The State of NCT of Delhi   through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the state CORAM: […]

Read More

Anukriti Dubey vs Partha Kansabanik And Anr

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Anukriti Dubey vs Partha Kansabanik And Anr on 23 March, 2016 Law Point: The tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband would definitely come within the category of shared household but as long as the tenancy JUDGEMENT 1. Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. The […]

Read More

Chitrangathan Vs. Seema

Court: HIGH COURT OF KERALA Bench: JUSTICE MRS.JUSTICE K.HEMA Chitrangathan Vs. Seema on 14th day of October, 2009 Law Point: While protecting the rights of a woman, the court has to be careful and cautious in not violating the rights of the male also under Domestic Violence Act. JUDGEMENT Head Note:- Protection of Woman from […]

Read More

Krishna Bhatacharjee vs Sarathi Choudhury and Anr

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Dipak Misra, Prafulla C. Pant Krishna Bhatacharjee vs Sarathi Choudhury And Anr on 20 November, 2015 Law Point: Maintainability of  DV after 1 year JUDGEMENT Leave granted. 2. The appellant having lost the battle for getting her Stridhan back from her husband, the first respondent herein, before the learned Magistrate […]

Read More

Kapil Goyal Vs. State Of U.P. and Anr

Court: High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad Bench: JUSTICE Ram Surat Ram Kapil Goyal  Vs. State Of U.P. And Anr on 25.4.2016 Anil Kumar Bajpai, Adv. For the appellant G.A. For the respondent. Law Point: Written Statement/reply can be filed by husband staying outside India through Power of Attorney in a maintenance case JUDGEMENT Heard Sri Anil Kumar Bajpai for the petitioner. This […]

Read More

Nishant Hussain vs Seema Saddique & Anr

Court: Rajasthan High Court Bench: JUSTICE MRS. NISHA GUPTA Nishant Hussain vs Seema Saddique & Anr on 21 September, 2012 Law Point: Living apart from 10 years, no cause of action to initiate DV proceedings JUDGEMENT This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 30.3.2012 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.3, […]

Read More

Inderjit Singh Grewal vs State Of Punjab & Anr

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan Inderjit Singh Grewal vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 23 August, 2011 Law Point: In view of the provisions of Section 468 Code of CrPC, DV complaint could be filed only within a period of one year from the date of the incident in […]

Read More

J.Srinivas S/O Sri.Jayachandra vs G.Dhanalakshmi D/O Govindaswamy

Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY J.Srinivas S/O Sri.Jayachandra vs G.Dhanalakshmi D/O Govindaswamy on 5 April, 2013 Law Point: Petitioner barred by time in filing DV after 1 year from the date of alleged cause of action JUDGEMENT 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. The counsel for the respondent remains absent. 2. The brief facts […]

Read More

Gurudev S/O. Hanamant Gurav vs Jayashree W/O. Gurudev Gurav

Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: K.N.Phaneendra Gurudev S/O. Hanamant Gurav vs Jayashree W/O. Gurudev Gurav on 8 January, 2014 Law Point: Bar on filing DV after 1 year as per section 468 CrPC JUDGEMENT 1. Though this petition is posted for admission, with the consent of both the Counsels, the matter is heard on merits. 2. […]

Read More

Raj Kumar Vs. State

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICES Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice mukta Gupta Raj Kumar vs State on 19 April, 2016 Law Point: Mobile Phone used as a camera, containing material photograph admitted without certificate u/s Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act, falls under primary evidence. JUDGEMENT 1. Battered and tormented, Gudia has been held to have suffered a […]

Read More