Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

false allegations

V. Shankaraiah Vs. State Of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE C.Y. Somayajulu V. Shankaraiah Vs. State Of A.p. Decided on 11 February 2002 Law Point: Abetment of Suicide : No Averment in Charge Sheet or Material on Record to Show Petitioner Either Induced Deceased to Commit Suicide or Aided Suicide of Deceased : He is not Liable to […]

Read More

V. Chandrasekharan Vs. Vasantha & Anr.

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.C. Jain V. Chandrasekharan Vs. Vasantha & Anr. Decided on 26 August 1993 Law Point: Plea of entrustment of jewelry and refusal to return demand for the first time — Other litigation pending — Whether proceedings liable to be quashed ? (Yes). JUDGEMENT 1. Shri V. Chandrasekharan, the petitioner […]

Read More

Yogesh Chhibbar Vs. State Of U.P.

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: U.S. Tripathi Yogesh Chhibbar Vs. State Of U.P. Decided on 06 December 1999 Law Point: Complaint Filed by Un-authorised Person : Cognizance Wrongly Taken — Dowry Prohibition Officer Not Empowered to File Complaint — Power to file complaint cannot be inferred from analogy of powers of Dowry Prohibition Officer enumerated […]

Read More

Moka Ram Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Anr.

Court: Rajasthan High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.C. Mital Moka Ram Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. Decided on 2 June 2000 Law Point: Cognizance of offence taken on vague statements recorded By Investigation Officer of the rank of Dy. Superintendent of Police : No Specific Allegation Against Petitioner. JUDGEMENT 1. This petition under Section 482, […]

Read More

Satish Kumar Gogia & Others Vs. State Of Haryana & Another

Court: Punjab and haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE J.B. Garg Satish Kumar Gogia & Others Vs. State Of Haryana & Another ANOTHER Decided on 2 December 1993 Law Point: Brothers of husband arraigned as accused without substance — FIR quashed a qua them. JUDGEMENT 1. Satish Kumar Gogia is the husband, Prem Dass Gogia the […]

Read More

Deepak Shukla Vs. Mahendra Chanpuriya

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.S. Saraf Deepak Shukla Vs. Mahendra Chanpuriya Decided on 31 August 2001 Law Point: Cruelty for Demand of Dowry Alleged to be made on 1.6.1993; Complaint Filed Beyond Three Years of Date 1.6.1993, Barred by Limitation : Allegations Regarding Demand of Dowry Figment of Imagination : Complaint Filed […]

Read More

Pashaura Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Anr.

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICE Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha Pashaura Singh Vs. State Of Punjab & Anr. 13 November 2011 Law Point: Bigamy — Ingredients of Section 494, discussed — In present case ingredients of Section 494 not satisfied — Appellant’s marriage with K was not subsisting on date of second marriage […]

Read More

Amit Garg & Ors. Vs. State Of U.p. & Ors.

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: JUSTICE Ravindra Singh Amit Garg & Ors. Vs. State Of U.p. & Ors. Decided on 3 May 2011 Law Point: Hurt, Cruelty, Criminal Intimidation, Dowry Demand — Quashing of charge-sheet — CJM took cognizance but not perused the charge-sheet and perused order in a casual manner — He has not […]

Read More

Rajneesh & Ors. Vs. State Of Haryana & Ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE Mehinder Singh Sullar Rajneesh & Ors. Vs. State Of Haryana & Ors. Decided on 24 September 2012 Law Point: Complainant has no objection if impugned FIR and all other consequent proceedings arising thereto against petitioners are quashed — Since the compromise is in their welfare and interest, […]

Read More

Subhash Sikhwal Vs. State Of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan High Court Bench: JUSTICE B.J. Shethna Subhash Sikhwal Vs. State Of Rajasthan Decided on 13 April 2004 Law Point: D.N.A. Test Application: Sensitive Case : In such Type of Matrimonial Cases, Judge cannot Afford to Sit Tight Over Matter for Long Time : Family Court Directed to Decide Application Expeditiously. JUDGEMENT 1. Notice […]

Read More