Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

divorce

Sundar Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, P. Sathasivam Sundar Babu & Ors vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 19 February, 2009 Law Point: 498 A Quash, Complaint filed after a long gap JUDGEMENT Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the learned single Judge of the Madras […]

Read More

Parveen Mehta Vs. Inderjit Mehta

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: D.P. Mohapatra, Brijesh Kumar. Parveen Mehta vs Inderjit Mehta on 11 July, 2002 Law Point: Defination of Mental Cruelty. In case of mental cruelty it will not be a correct approach to take an instance of misbehavior in isolation and then pose the question whether such behavior is sufficient […]

Read More

Surender Kumar Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi District Court Bench: Sh. Daya Prakash Surender Kumar vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 13 May, 2014 Law Point: Acquittal in 498 A – Benefit of doubt due to afterthought and incredible version of prosecution   JUDGEMENT   1. By this judgment, I shall dispose off the present appeal under Section 374 […]

Read More

Sushil Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Arijit Pasayat, H.K. Sema Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 July, 2005 Law Point: Misuse of 498A is Legal Terrorism. Merely because the provision is constitutional and intra vires, does not give a licence to unscrupulous persons to wreck personal vendetta or unleash harassment […]

Read More

Pankaj Mahajan Vs. Dimple @ Kajal

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan Pankaj Mahajan vs Dimple @ Kajal on 30 September, 2011 Law Point: Suicide Threats a Ground for Divorce JUDGEMENT P.Sathasivam,J. 1) Leave granted. 2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 06.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at […]

Read More

Zeba Khalil Wife Of Prof. Khalil A. Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: M Jain, M Chaudhary Zeba Khalil Wife Of Prof. Khalil A. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. on 18 November, 2005 Law Point: Action under Section 340 Cr.P.C. is undertaken in the interest of justice and not to satisfy the private grudge of a litigant. Every case of perjury […]

Read More

Smt. Vimal Kanta Vs. Shri J.M. Kohli

Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR Smt. Vimal Kanta vs Shri J.M. Kohli on 13 January, 2011 Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Geeta Luthra and Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Divorce at 80 years after 16 years of case proceedings JUDGEMENT 1. The appellant at this old age of 80 years is before this […]

Read More

Rishi Pal Vs. Luxmi Devi and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE O.P.DWIVEDI Rishi Pal vs Luxmi Devi And Another on 27 August, 2009 Mr. Vishal Gupta, Adv. For the appellant. None For the respondent. Law Point: It is well settled law, that filing of false criminal case against the spouse is an act of cruelty, on the basis of which the spouse suffering, is […]

Read More

G. K. Chenthil Kannan Vs. Sathyabama

Court: Madras High Court Bench: The Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.CHANDRU G.K.Chenthil Kannan vs Sathyabama on 21 August, 2009 Mr.Ashok Menon, Adv. For the appellant. Ms.K.Sumathi, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Visitation rights won by Father for holidays JUDGEMENT The main Original Petition was filed by the petitioner under Section 25 of the Guardian andWards Act, 1890 for directing the entrustment of the custody of […]

Read More

Mr. Paul Mohinder Gahun Vs. Mrs. Selina Gahun

Court: High Court of Delhi Equivalent citations: 130 (2006) DLT 524 Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Mr. Paul Mohinder Gahun vs Mrs. Selina Gahun on 1 June, 2006 Law Point: Jurisdiction explained, order in favor of husband JUDGEMENT 1. Admit. 2. At the request of the learned Counsel for the parties, the petition is taken […]

Read More