Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

divorce

Ms. Nidhi Kaushik Vs. Union Of India & Ors

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Ms. Nidhi Kaushik vs Union Of India And Ors. on 4 September, 2013 Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Adv. For the appellant. Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. J.C. Seth, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4.  Law Point: Domestic Violence is no bar for denying promotion, is not a criminal offence […]

Read More

Amar Singh Vs. State Of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: R.M. Lodha, A.K. Patnaik Amar Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 August, 2010 Law Point: Mere demand of dowry cannot be prosecuted u/s 498A or 304B JUDGEMENT CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 854 of 2004 This is an appeal against the judgment dated 07.10.2003 of the High Court of Rajasthan, […]

Read More

Shlok Bhardwaj Vs. Runika Bhardwaj

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Adarsh Kumar Goel Shlok Bhardwaj vs Runika Bhardwaj & Ors on 10 December, 2014 Law Point: After Mutual Consent Divorce Disputes can not be reopened. High Court will ordinarily not interfere in revision with an order of acquittal except in exceptional cases JUDGEMENT 1. This appeal […]

Read More

Sundar Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, P. Sathasivam Sundar Babu & Ors vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 19 February, 2009 Law Point: 498 A Quash, Complaint filed after a long gap JUDGEMENT Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the learned single Judge of the Madras […]

Read More

Parveen Mehta Vs. Inderjit Mehta

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: D.P. Mohapatra, Brijesh Kumar. Parveen Mehta vs Inderjit Mehta on 11 July, 2002 Law Point: Defination of Mental Cruelty. In case of mental cruelty it will not be a correct approach to take an instance of misbehavior in isolation and then pose the question whether such behavior is sufficient […]

Read More

Surender Kumar Vs. The State (NCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi District Court Bench: Sh. Daya Prakash Surender Kumar vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 13 May, 2014 Law Point: Acquittal in 498 A – Benefit of doubt due to afterthought and incredible version of prosecution   JUDGEMENT   1. By this judgment, I shall dispose off the present appeal under Section 374 […]

Read More

Sushil Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Arijit Pasayat, H.K. Sema Sushil Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India And Ors on 19 July, 2005 Law Point: Misuse of 498A is Legal Terrorism. Merely because the provision is constitutional and intra vires, does not give a licence to unscrupulous persons to wreck personal vendetta or unleash harassment […]

Read More

Pankaj Mahajan Vs. Dimple @ Kajal

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan Pankaj Mahajan vs Dimple @ Kajal on 30 September, 2011 Law Point: Suicide Threats a Ground for Divorce JUDGEMENT P.Sathasivam,J. 1) Leave granted. 2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 06.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at […]

Read More

Zeba Khalil Wife Of Prof. Khalil A. Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: M Jain, M Chaudhary Zeba Khalil Wife Of Prof. Khalil A. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. on 18 November, 2005 Law Point: Action under Section 340 Cr.P.C. is undertaken in the interest of justice and not to satisfy the private grudge of a litigant. Every case of perjury […]

Read More

Smt. Vimal Kanta Vs. Shri J.M. Kohli

Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR Smt. Vimal Kanta vs Shri J.M. Kohli on 13 January, 2011 Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Geeta Luthra and Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Divorce at 80 years after 16 years of case proceedings JUDGEMENT 1. The appellant at this old age of 80 years is before this […]

Read More