Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

counter cases

Counter Cases in 498A – Debunking Forwarded IPC Sections

Counter Cases – Debunking Forwards of IPC Sections When passions run high, the reasoning goes on sick leave. How many of us agree with the above adage? I do. This mail might be like dousing cold water on the fires raging in some of you to file countercases. Whenever I meet a victim, they first […]

Read More

Syed Nazim Husain Vs. The Additional Principal Judge

Court: High Court Of Allahabad Bench: JUSTICE A. Mateen Syed Nazim Husain Vs. The Additional Principal Judge Family Court & another on 9.1.2003 Law Point: Perjury application must be decided first before proceeding with the case.     JUDGEMENT   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. Since a very trivial point is involved I propose […]

Read More

Chandra Shashi Vs. Anil Kumar Verma

Court: Supreme Court of India Equivalent citations: 1995 SCC (1) 421, JT 1994 (7) 459 Bench: JUSTICE Hansaria B.L. Chandra Shashi vs Anil Kumar Verma on 14 November, 1994 Law Point: No one should indulge in immoral acts like perjury, prevarication and motivated falsehoods : 2 weeks imprisonment     JUDGEMENT   The Judgment of […]

Read More

Rajkumar Indoria Vs. Nct Of Delhi

Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Sanjiv Khanna Rajkumar Indoria Vs. Nct Of Delhi, New Delhi on 18 August, 2010 Law Point: Every allegations do not justify initiation of prosecution under 340 CRPC. Perjury explained   JUDGEMENT   1. The writ petition filed by the petitioner for police protection to him and his family members […]

Read More

Garima Srivastava Vs. State Of U.P. and Another

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: JUSTICE A.K. Roopanwal Garima Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 January 2010 Mr. Gopal Narain Aggarwal, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.Narinder Kaushik, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Wife fined 10,000 for false affidavit and perjury proceedings initiated   JUDGEMENT   In this petition orders dated 15.7.09 and 7.10.09 passed by the Principal Judge, Family […]

Read More

Dr. Mahesh Hasija, Sonepat Vs. ITO

  Court: Central Information Commission   Dr.Mahesh Hasija vs Cbdt on 30 October, 2013 Law Point: Broad outcome of the TEP to be provided to appellant once the enquiry has been completed       JUDGEMENT   Vide RTI dt 1.4.13, appellant had sought information on 4 points relating to TEP dt 29.8.11 against Shri […]

Read More

Ms Juhi Jadli Vs. Income Tax

Court: Central Information Commission Mr.Juhi Jadli vs CBDT on 3 June, 2013 Law Point: Spouse Not a Third Party if Marriage Subsists     JUDGEMENT   Heard today dated 03.06.2013. Appellant not present. The public authority is represented by Shri S.S. Chahal, ITO Ward 1(4), Nodia. 2. By RTI application dated 07.09.2011, the appellant had […]

Read More

Babubhai Vs. State

Court: Gujarat High Court Bench: JUSTICE M.R. SHAH Babubhai vs State on 18 August, 2010 Law Point: Initiation of Perjury proceedings, 25K to be deposited as probable fine.   JUDGEMENT   In response to the Notice issued by this Court, the petitioner is personally present in the Court and Mr.M.B.Gandhi, learned advocate has appeared for him. […]

Read More

Arun Kumar Agarwal Vs. Radha Arun

Court: Karnataka High Court Equivalent citations: I (2002) DMC 84, ILR 2001 KAR 4925 Bench: JUSTICE M Anwar Arun Kumar Agarwal vs Mrs. Radha Arun on 15 March, 2001 Law Point: Petition under CrPC 340 to be decided only at the end.   JUDGEMENT   1. By the above appeal, the appellant herein intends to […]

Read More

Nachhattar Singh Alias Khanda and Vs. State Of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICES Mehtab S.gill and Jitendra Chauhan Nachhattar Singh Alias Khanda And Vs. State Of Punjab on 23 September, 2009 Law Point: Prosecution to be initiated under section 340 CrPC for false case   JUDGEMENT   This is an appeal against the judgment dated 18.7.1998 of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, […]

Read More
  • 1
  • 2