Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

alimony

Godambari Devi Vs. Devi Prasad & Ors.

Court:Uttarakhand High Court Bench: Nirmal Yadav & Prafulla C. Pant Godambari Devi Vs. Devi Prasad & Ors. On 16 September 2010 Law Point: Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 28 — Appeal against grant of decree of divorce — Appellant treated husband with cruelty and deserted him in May 1996 without any sufficient cause — […]

Read More

Gurdeep Singh Vs. Daljit Kaur

Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE V.K. Jhanji Gurdeep Singh Vs. Daljit Kaur On 7 January 1997 Law Point: Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 25 — Permanent Alimony and Maintenance — Permanent alimony can be granted only when “decree” is passed — Order dismissing divorce petition is not ‘decree’ — After dismissal […]

Read More

Nalini Prava Behera & Ors. Vs. Akshaya Kumar Behera

Court: Orissa High Court Bench: JUSTICE B. Panigrahi & Ch. P.K. Misra Nalini Prava Behera & Ors. Vs. Akshaya Kumar Behera on 7 November 2002 Law Point: Permanent Alimony and maintenance : Quantum : While deciding amount Social status, economic condition and standard of living of parties should be kept in view : Taking provision […]

Read More

Bhausaheb @ Sandu S/o Raghuji Vs. Leelabai W/o Bhausaheb Magar

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE N Dabholkar, A Naik, N Patil N.P. ABU Vs. VELLAM THOTTIL ASMA & ORS. On 26 August 1998 Law Point: No Permanent Alimony in Sec 11, Permanent Alimony may be asked in sec 12. JUDGEMENT 1. While considering Family Court Appeal No. 12/2003, Bhausaheb v. Leelabai, a Division Bench […]

Read More