Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

acquittal in 498a

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ashok Narayan Dandalwar

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICES G.B. Pattanaik and S.N. Variava State of Maharashtra Vs. Ashok Narayan Dandalwar On 27 April 2000 Law Point: Section 498A – There is not the slightest assertion in any of the letters complaining against the husband either he was making any demand at any point of time or […]

Read More

State Of Maharashtra Vs. Vasant Kumar

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE A.P. Bhangale State Of Maharashtra Vs. Vasant Kumar On 17 February 2012 Law Point: Sections 306, 498A – Abetment of Suicide — Cruelty — Dying declaration — Not reliable — Dying declaration in question does not spell out offence punishable under Section 306 and Section 498A, IPC.     […]

Read More

Pradeep Singh Vs. State Of Bihar

Court: Patna High Court Bench: JUSTICES R.N. Prasad & C.M. Prasad Pradeep Singh Vs. State Of Bihar On 9 January 2004 Law Point: Sections 302/34, 498-A and 201 — Murder, common Intention, Cruelty, Disappearance of Evidence : No eye-witness to occurrence : Defence denied marriage with deceased : Evident from evidence of prosecution witnesses that […]

Read More

Penchala Sadaiah & Ors. Vs. State Of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE Dalava Subrahmanyam PENCHALA SADAIAH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF A.P. On 18 July 2003 Law Point: Prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment for not fulfilling demand for additional dowry and failed to prove offence under Section 498A, IPC. Husband not found guilty of offences under Sections 304-B […]

Read More

Dagadu Shankar Todmal Vs. State Of Maharashtra

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE A.D. Mane & R.G. Deshpande Dagadu Shankar Todmal Vs. State Of Maharashtra On 28/29.7.1997 Law Point: Altercation or conflict between husband and wife does not amount to “cruelty” and cannot attract provisions of Section 498A. Conviction cannot be based on sentimental approach. JUDGEMENT 1. This appeal is filed by […]

Read More

Rajendra Ramkrishna Lande Vs. State Of Maharashtra

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE Vishnu Sahai Rajendra Ramkrishna Lande Vs. State Of Maharashtra On 30 July 1997 Law Point: Allegations of general nature. Not a case of prosecution that Husband used to physically ill-treat deceased Wife.Fit case to grant benefit of doubt to appellant.     JUDGEMENT   1. Through this appeal, the […]

Read More

State Of U.P. Vs. Sushil Kumar Jain & Ors.

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: JUSTICE Bhanwar Singh State Of U.P. Vs. Sushil Kumar Jain & Ors. On 23 May 2002 Law Point: Not Dowry but Suspected Bad Character of Wife was Main Cause of Strained Relationship Between Two and such Strained Relationship Turned into Bitterness, Eventually Leading to their Divorce. Trial Court Rightly Recorded […]

Read More

Tarun @ Gautam Mukherjee Vs. State Of West Bengal

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICE G.B. Pattanaik & Doraiswamy Raju Tarun @ Gautam Mukherjee Vs. State Of West Bengal On 4.5.2000 Law Point: Appreciation of Evidence : Charge Not Established — High Court on scrutiny of evidence held that offence under Section 306, I.P.C. not established by prosecution but offence under Section 498-A, […]

Read More

Shekhar Amonkar Vs. State

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE G.D. Kamat & A.A. Halbe Shekhar Amonkar Vs. State Law Point: Apreciation of evidence, benefit of doubt given to accused Husband.     JUDGEMENT   1. Being aggrieved by the conviction for offences punishable under Sections 478-A, 306, 323 and 506 (Part II) of the Indian Penal Code and […]

Read More

B. Venkat Swamy Vs. Vijaya Nehru & Anr.

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICE Dr. Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam and Aftab Alam B. Venkat Swamy Vs. Vijaya Nehru & Anr. On 25.8.2008 Law Point: Appeal against acquittal — Circumstantial evidence — Prosecution has not established accusations — In cross-examination P.W. 1 categorically admitted that deceased never personally informed him about alleged harassment […]

Read More