Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Sexual Crimes

Saganna Vs. The State Of Karnataka

    Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: JUSTICE Anand Byrareddy Saganna vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 February, 2013 Law Point: Willing partner, complainant had opportunity to complain on many occasions, continued to stay with accused. Acquital.     JUDGEMENT   Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader for […]

Read More

Tilak Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICES T.S. Thakur, C.J.I. and V. Gopala Gowda Tilak Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh On 06 January 2016 Law Point: Prosecutrix was an adult and mature lady aged around 40 years at the time of incident. She admitted that she was in relationship with Appellant for two years […]

Read More

Ajay Kumar Sonar Vs. State

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Ajay Kumar Sonar Vs. State On 02 February 2016 Law Point: The prosecutrix was a consenting party and she and her mother opted to exonerate him in their cross-examination, the Sentence Order is modified .     JUDGEMENT   1. Challenge in this appeal is to a […]

Read More

Pradeep @ Balli Vs. State, NCT Of Delhi

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Pradeep @ Balli Vs. State, NCT Of Delhi On 1 December 2015 Law Point: The prosecution failed to bring home any of the charges against appellant beyond reasonable doubt — Prosecutrix‘s post-event conduct is unnatural and unacceptable — Prosecutrix was consenting party — She was aware that […]

Read More

State Vs. Brij Dev Tiwari @ Pandit

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg State Vs. Brij Dev Tiwari @ Pandit On 8 December 2015 Law Point: Testimony of baby gives a clear impression that she was coached and tutored before she gave a statement — Medical evidence did not support the commission of rape — Delay in lodging FIR has […]

Read More

Malti Chauhan Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Indermeet Kaur Malti Chauhan Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors. On 04.12.2015 Law Point: Attempt to rape. Star witness is the prosecutrix herself – MLC of the victim and the FSL report do not support the version of the prosecution – Testimony of the prosecutrix […]

Read More

Raj Kishore @ Raj Kumar Vs. State (GNCT Of Delhi)

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Raj Kishore @ Raj Kumar Vs. State (GNCT Of Delhi) On 5 January 2016 Law Point: Wrongful Confinement — Outraging modesty of woman — Rape. No external injuries found on body of prosecutrix ruling out ‘force’ used by accused to ravish her — FSL reports absolve accused […]

Read More

State of Karnataka Vs. F. Nataraj

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICE Pinaki Chandra Ghose and R.K. Agrawal State of Karnataka Vs. F. Nataraj On 07 October 2015 Law Point: The gaps in the evidences of the prosecutrix and the medical officer make it highly improbable that sexual intercourse took place. It would be erroneous to rely upon such discrepant […]

Read More

Raghuvinder Harna Vs. State Of NCT Of Delhi

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Raghuvinder Harna Vs. State Of NCT Of Delhi On 5 November 2015 Law Point: Physical relations were outcome of free consent of appellant and prosecutrix and she was willing and consenting party — It did not attract Section 376, IPC.     JUDGEMENT   1. Aggrieved by […]

Read More

Mohit Yadav Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.P. Garg Mohit Yadav Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) On 09 October 2015 Law Point: Status report reveals that the petitioner and the prosecitrix were acquainted with each other – Physical relations were established on several occasions between them. The prosecutrix is married and a major lady. […]

Read More