Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

Suman Kaushik Vs. N.P. Kaushik

Court: High Court Of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Ms. Veena Birbal Suman Kaushik Vs. N.P. Kaushik Law Point: Divorce on the ground of desertion and cruelty – Parties lived together for 7 months and litigating for 25 years – Husband employed as judicial officer and wife working under government – Wife making various complaints in respect […]

Read More

Hamidan Khatoon & Ors. Vs. State Of Jharkhand & Anr.

Court: Jharkhand High Court Bench: JUSTICE Hari Shankar Prasad Hamidan Khatoon & Ors. Vs. State Of Jharkhand & Anr. On 28 April 2004 Law Point: FIR lodged with ulterior motive by way of causing harassment : Its continuance will be abuse of process of Court : Criminal proceedings quashed. JUDGEMENT 1. This application under Section […]

Read More

Sharda Vs. Dharmpal

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: JUSTICE V.N. Khare, CJI., S.B. Sinha & Dr. A.R. Lakshmanan Sharda Vs. Dharmpal On 28 March 2003 Law Point: Power of Court to direct medical examination of party to matrimonial litigation not violative of Article 21 of Constitution : Court should exercise such power if applicant has strong prima […]

Read More

V.P. Dhanesh Vs. State Of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand High Court Bench: JUSTICE Vikramaditya Prasad V.P. Dhanesh Vs. State Of Jharkhand On 23 September 2003 Law Point: Cognizance and proceedings under Section 498-A, IPC, legal and cannot be interfered with : Proceeding in respect of offences under Sections 3 and 4, Dowry Prohibition Act quashed.     JUDGEMENT   1. This application […]

Read More

Ranganath Parmeshwar Panditrao Mali & Anr. Vs. Eknath Gajanan Kulkarni & Anr.

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICE K. Ramaswamy & G.B. Pattanaik Ranganath Parmeshwar Panditrao Mali & Anr. Vs. Eknath Gajanan Kulkarni & Anr. On 12 January 1996 Law Point: Factum of marriage — Not established — Legality of a presumption, of living together.     JUDGEMENT   1. The appellants are the plaintiffs who […]

Read More

Pushpa Devi Vs. Om Parkash

Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE Rajesh Sharma Pushpa Devi Vs. Om Parkash Law Point: Filing of false complaints and threatening the Husband amount to acts of cruelty. Wife used to leave the matrimonial home at her own will, which amounts to desertion. Decree of divorce granted to Husband. JUDGEMENT 1. This appeal has […]

Read More

Adultery can be Proved through Circumstantial Evidences Alone

Punjab & Haryana High Court JUSTICES S.S. Saron & Navita Singh Shikha Vs. Jasvinder Singh & Anr. On 8 July 2014 Law Point: The charge can be established by circumstantial evidence — It is not always possible that witnesses would see one of the spouses with paramour in objectionable posture to prove charge of adultery. […]

Read More

Dr.XXXXX Vs. Mrs. YYYYY

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Indermeet Kaur Dr.XXXXX  vs Mrs. YYYYY on 15 July 2011 Law Point: Visitation rights granted for twice a month to estranged father of three year old child of parties for a period of one hour on each visitation. Order revised and visitation granted for thrice a month and for […]

Read More

Azad Singh & Ors. Vs. State Of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE Jasbir Singh Azad Singh & Ors. Vs. State Of Haryana On 21 May 2003 Law Point: Quashing of FIR : Case registered under Sections 304-B and 498-A, I.P.C. after death of bride after gap of about 2 years : May be out of sheer frustration and to […]

Read More

Jagjit Singh And Anr. Vs. Ravinder Kour

Court: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Bench: JUSTICE B Bhat Jagjit Singh And Anr. vs Ravinder Kour on 1 May 2003 Law Point: Complaint against the petitioner and taking of cognizance by the learned Magistrate under Section 406 RPC and issuance of process being time-barred by law, are quashed because the continuance of the proceedings […]

Read More