Judgement

Court: HIGH COURT OF DELHI Bench: JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD Shailendra Kumar Yadav vs State on 5 April 2022 Law Point: The Court emphasized the need for evidence showing fraudulent intent to vitiate consent in rape cases under false marriage promises. JUDGEMENT 1. This petition under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed […]

Court: HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Bench: JUSTICE V.M. Deshpande Chitra Vitthalrao Ade vs Ganesh Dinesh Dixit And Another on 17 February 2018 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT 1. This is an appeal filed by the complainant challenging judgment and order dated 8.7.2004 passed by the Court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No. […]

Court: HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND Bench: JUSTICE R.R.Prasad, J Anjana Rashmi Minz vs The State Of Jharkhand on 11 December 2014 Law Point: Consent given under a promise of marriage, based on love, is not a misconception of fact, and is voluntary. JUDGEMENT Heard   learned   counsel   appearing   for   the   appellant   […]

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE  G.S.SISTANI, J. State vs Abhinandan Kumar on 15 May 2017 Law Point: Leave to appeal dismissed; no error found in acquittal. Victim’s testimony unreliable, lacked corroboration. No strong grounds to interfere. JUDGEMENT 1. This is an application seeking condonation of 76 days delay in filing the present leave to appeal. […]

Court: HIGH COURT OF KERALA Bench: JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS Biju N.v. Vs State Of Kerala on 29 May 2019 Law Point: Consensual relationship under false marriage promise may allow anticipatory bail despite SC/ST Act bar, if custodial interrogation isn’t needed. JUDGEMENT 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 23.2.2019 rendered by the Special […]

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.K. AWASTHI Dr. Nitin Bhargav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 February, 2019 Law Point: Anticipatory bail granted as SC/ST Act bar not attracted; prosecutrix was consenting adult; delay in FIR noted. JUDGEMENT Heard. This appeal under section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention […]

Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Bench: JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Atul Kewat Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 04 October 2019 Law Point: Anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act allowed when no prima facie case exists or complaint appears mala fide upon judicial scrutiny. JUDGEMENT Shri Siddharth Datt, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Rajmani […]

Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Bench: Justice Subodh Abhyankar Yogesh Pawar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another on 21 June 2018 Law Point: Anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act is permissible if prima facie no bar under Section 18 is attracted per evidence. JUDGEMENT 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant under Section […]