Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

Vijay Verma Vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr

Court:Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Shiv Narayan Dhingra Vijay Verma Vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr. On 13 August 2010 Law Point: Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Sections 2(f), 12 — Domestic relationship — Claim by ‘aggrieved person’ — ‘At any point of time’ cannot be defined as ‘at any […]

Read More

Bhupender Singh Mehra Vs. State Nct Of Delhi & Anr.

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Shiv Narayan Dhingra Bhupender Singh Mehra Vs. State Nct Of Delhi & Anr. On 8 October 2010 Law Point: Before passing an order on application under Section 12 of the PWDVA 2005, Magistrate has to take into consideration domestic incident report received from the Protection Officer. Aggrieved person does […]

Read More

Baljinder Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: JUSTICES T.S. Thakur & R. Banumathi Baljinder Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab On 19 November 2014 Law Point: Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 304B, 498A — Dowry Death — Cruelty — Alleged demand of gold Karra about two months after marriage — Cannot constitute proximate live link with […]

Read More

Nilu @ Pratap Kumar Mohaptra Vs. State Of Orissa

Court: Orissa High Court Bench: JUSTICE M. Papanna Nilu @ Pratap Kumar Mohaptra Vs. State Of Orissa On 16 January 2004 Law Point: Sections 498-A, 304B, 201/34 — Quashing of Order : Cruelty, dowry death, disappearance of evidence, common intention : Appreciation of material on record : Involvement of petitioner in complicity of crime not […]

Read More

Vinod Kumar Arora Vs. State

Court: DELHI HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Veena Birbal Vinod Kumar Arora Vs. State On 16 May 2014 Law Point: Sections 304B, 498A – no demand of dowry was ever raised by the appellant and his other family members — wife only stated that her father was not happy with the marriage, allegations of dowry demand […]

Read More

Mungeshwar Prasad Chaurasia & Anr. Vs. State Of Bihar

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: JUSTICES K.T. Thomas, S.N. Variava Mungeshwar Prasad Chaurasia & Anr. Vs. State Of Bihar On 13 September 2001 Law Point: Dowry Death, Disappearance of Evidence, Common Intention, Cruelty: Appellants, Parents of Husband did not Harass Deceased or Demanded Dowry Soon Before Her Death : Said Act can be Attributed […]

Read More

State Of Karnataka Vs. K.S. Manjunathachari & Ors

Court:KARNATAKA HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICES Kumar Rajaratnam & B.K. Sangalad State Of Karnataka Vs. K.S. Manjunathachari & Ors On 16 April 1999 Law Point: Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 498-A, 304-B — Cruelty, Dowry Death : Conviction under Cruelty : Justified — Concept of cruelty is much wider than dowry harassment — Sections 498-A […]

Read More

Rajat Taneja Vs. Harmeeta Singh

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Pradeep Nandrajog Rajat Taneja Vs. Harmeeta Singh On 25 July 2007 Law Point: No opportunity granted to Husband to file reply to application filed by respondent under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act — Petitioner entitled to setting aside of order granting monthly maintenance to wife under Section 24 […]

Read More

K. Narasimhan Vs. Rohini Devanathan

Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: JUSTICE Huluvadi G. Ramesh K. Narasimhan Vs. Rohini Devanathan On 24 November 2009 Law Point: Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – Making certain allegations against respondent by itself would not amount to domestic violence in absence of ingredient of shared household — No proof of petitioner and […]

Read More

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Patricia Jean Mahajan & Others

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICES B.A. Khan & M.S.A. Siddiqui UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. PATRICIA JEAN MAHAJAN & OTHERS On 13 March 2001 Law Point: Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 149, 170 — Rules of evidence not required to be followed to hilt in adjudication of accident claims — No scope […]

Read More