Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

Prashant Bharti Vs. State Of Nct Of Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India Equivalent citations: 2003 (1) AWC 344 SC, (2003) 2 CALLT 23 SC Bench: D.K. Jain, Jagdish Singh Khehar Prashant Bharti vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 January, 2013 Law Point: False rape case, quashed by Delhi High Court   JUDGEMENT   1. Leave granted. 2. On 16.2.2007, Priya […]

Read More

Narender Kumar Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Court: Delhi District Court Bench: Sh. Gurdeep Saini Narender Kumar vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 18 August, 2011 Law Point: Poverty and failed marriage is not a crime, commentary on gross misuse of IPC 498A provision   JUDGEMENT   1. Vide this order I shall decide this appeal directed against judgment dated […]

Read More

Hrishikesh Talukdar Vs. Purabi Baishya

Court: Gauhati High Court Bench: JUSTICE Ajit Singh, CJ. & Manojit Bhuyan Hrishikesh Talukdar Vs. Purabi Baishya On 8 February 2018 Law Point: Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Sections 13(1)(ia) — Cruelty — Wife repeatedly maligned reputation of appellant-husband in public — She approached Mahila Samity and Media through press conference as well as newspaper […]

Read More

Jaswinder Kaur & Ors. Vs. State Of Punjab & Anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE L.N. Mittal Jaswinder Kaur & Ors. Vs. State Of Punjab & Anr. On 7 January 2013 Law Point: Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Section 12 r/w Sections 18, 19(1), 20, 22, 23 — Quashing of […]

Read More

Court on its own motion versus Ravinder Kumar

Court: Delhi District Court (Rohini) Bench: Dr. KAMINI LAU Court on its own motion Vs. Ravinder Kumar on 5.7.2010 Law Point: 1 Month Jail for False Witness   JUDGEMENT   The above mentioned FIR had been registered on the statement of Ravinder Kumar stated to be an eye witness of the incident in which Ashok son […]

Read More

Natraj & Ors. Vs. State Of Maharashtra

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE P.D. Kode Natraj & Ors. Vs. State Of Maharashtra On 28 June 2013 Law Point: Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 498A, 34 — Quashing of Proceedings— Cruelty — Common Intention — Settlement between parties — Marriage petition withdrawn in terms […]

Read More

Rupa & Ors. Vs. State Of U.P. & Anr.

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.C. Agarwal Rupa & Ors. Vs. State Of U.P & Anr. On 29 August 2013 Law Point: Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 498A — Cruelty — In FIR no allegations of harassment leveled against applicants — Offence under Section 498A, IPC can only be committed by husband of […]

Read More

No Maintenance on basis of Speculation of Income of Husband

Madhya Pradesh High Court JUSTICE Dipak Misra Raghubir Yadav Vs. Purnima Kharga (Yadav) On 18 September 2000 Law Point: Income of Husband Fixed on Conjectures: Fact that Wife Worked in Television Serials and Stage Plays and Earned Some Income from said Sources, not Considered by A.D.J.: Trial Judge’s Order does not Withstand Close Scrutiny : […]

Read More

HMA 24 Maintenance can not be increased in Revision

Calcutta High Court JUSTICE Tarun Chatterjee Malaya Das (Nee) Ghosh Vs. Basudeb Das On 30 September 1996 Law Point: Revisional Court –– Does not retain its jurisdiction to increase the maintenance. JUDGEMENT This revisional application is directed against an order being order No. 102 dated 23rd May, 1994 passed by Mr. R.N. Mallick Choudhury, Additional […]

Read More

Amendment to Amount of Maintenance Claimed Not Allowed

Allahabad High Court JUSTICE R.D. Khare Mohd. Akhtar Siddiqui @ Babar Vs. State Of U.P. & Ors. On 10 September 2009 Law Point: Amendment application amending amount claimed in proceedings under Section 125, Cr.P.C. — Not permissible in law — Impugned order passed on amendment application unsustainable in eyes of law and set aside. JUDGEMENT […]

Read More