Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

Domestic Violence Dismissed in Bangalore Court

Court: High Court of the judicial magistrate, Bangaluru Bench: Justice Vishwanath Savadi xxxxxx vs xxxxxx on 27 January, 2025 Law Point: DV Dismissed in Bangalore Court JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner has filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, against the respondent, seeking various forms of relief […]

Read More

340 Established in Saket Court, Delhi

Court: Family Court Saket Delhi Bench: Justice Sumita Garg xxxxxx vs xxxxxx on 17 January, 2025 Law Point: Section 340 Established in Saket Court, Delhi JUDGEMENT 1. By this order, I shall dcide aan application under section 340 CrPC preferred by the petitioner/hunband for initiating proceedings for committing perjuy agaist the respondent/wife. 2. The brief […]

Read More

Contested Divorce in 6 Year in Patiala House Courts Delhi

Court: Patiala House Courts Bench: Justice Sukhvinder Kaur xxxxxxxxx Versus xxxxxxxx on 21 December 2024 Law Point: Contested Divorce in 6 Year in Delhi JUDGEMENT 1. Petitioner/husband has filed the present petition u/s 13(1)(ia) Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for the sake of brevity) praying for dissolution of marriage by […]

Read More

Anticipatory bail in pocso case to father & grandfather

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan xxxxxxxxx Versus xxxxxxxx on 16 December 2024 Law Point: Anticipatory bail in pocso case to father & grandfather JUDGEMENT 1. These Bail Applications are filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. 2. These two bail applications are connected, and therefore, I am disposing of these […]

Read More

340 Established in Rohini, Delhi Court

xxxxxx Vs. xxxxxx AND ORS Present: Sh. R.N. Singh L.d. Counsel for the complainant Sh. Vaibhav Nijhawan, L.d. Counsel for respondents Matter is fixed for orders on application u/s 340 Cr.p.c. in connected matter. The application filed by respondent in Crl. Misc 25/2024 stands allowed. Complainant is directed to file ITR of financial year 2022-2023 […]

Read More

NBCC (India) Ltd. Versus The State Of West Bengal & Ors.

In what could be a termed as a massive shift for precedential value of a Judgment, the Supreme Court recently emphasized the critical importance of explicitly stating the intended purpose and scope of a judgment within the judgment itself. In a significant observation, the Court elaborated that not every judicial pronouncement automatically qualifies as a […]

Read More

If Evidence of Victim does not inspire confidence; no conviction in Rape Case

The Supreme Court repeated a significant observation regarding rape cases, emphasizing that when a conviction relies solely on the testimony of a single witness, particularly the victim herself, such evidence must inspire absolute confidence in the Court. The Court, while acknowledging the substantial weight given to victim statements in such sensitive cases, stressed the paramount importance of […]

Read More

State (Gnct Of Delhi) vs Vipin @ Lalla

Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, Prashant Kumar Mishra State (Gnct Of Delhi) vs Vipin @ Lalla on 7 January, 2025 Law Point: If Evidence of Victim does not inspire confidence; no conviction in Rape Case JUDGEMENT 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard Ms. Sonia Mathur, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant […]

Read More

Only place where minor is ordinarily resident has jurisdiction for Guardian and Wards Act Case – Judgement Analysis

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that the “ordinary residence of a child” determines which court has jurisdiction in custody cases under the Guardianship & Wards Act, not the child’s “natural guardianship.” The court emphasized these two concepts cannot be mixed. Under Section 9 of the GWA, custody applications must be filed where […]

Read More

Only place where minor is ordinarily resident has jurisdiction for Guardian and Wards Act Case

Court: High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh Bench: Justice Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta xxxxxxxxx Versus xxxxxxxx on 07 January 2025 Law Point: Only place where minor is ordinarily resident has jurisdiction for Guardian and Wards Act Case JUDGEMENT 1. The dispute pertains to territorial jurisdiction of the court to entertain a poon for […]

Read More