Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

Rameshwar @ Pappu & Ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors.

Court: RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Kumar Garg RAMESHWAR @ PAPPU & ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. On 22.1.2001 Law Point: Settlement and Understanding Between Spouses to Amicably Live Together with Harmony: Permission to Compound Offence Granted. JUDGEMENT This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the accused petitioners under Section 482, […]

Read More

Kiran Tulshiram Ingale Vs. Anupama P. Gaikwad And Ors.

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE D Deshpande, S Bobde Kiran Tulshiram Ingale vs Anupama P. Gaikwad And Ors. on 25 July, 2006 Law Point: The criminal proceedings against Husband so also his conviction quashed in view of the mutual understanding, divorce and compromise between Husband and Wife. JUDGEMENT 1. Heard advocates for the petitioner […]

Read More

Durg Vijai Yadav Vs. State Of U.p. & Anr.

Court: ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Jayashree Tiwari DURG VIJAI YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANR. On 29 August 2012 Law Point: Grant of Maintenance — From date of filing application. Express orders are necessary and no special reasons are required to be recorded by Court. JUDGEMENT   Case called out in the revised […]

Read More

Bhausaheb @ Sandu S/o Raghuji Vs. Leelabai W/o Bhausaheb Magar

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE N Dabholkar, A Naik, N Patil N.P. ABU Vs. VELLAM THOTTIL ASMA & ORS. On 26 August 1998 Law Point: No Permanent Alimony in Sec 11, Permanent Alimony may be asked in sec 12. JUDGEMENT 1. While considering Family Court Appeal No. 12/2003, Bhausaheb v. Leelabai, a Division Bench […]

Read More

B.P. Achala Anand Vs. S. Appi Reddy & Anr

Court:Supreme Court of India Bench: JUSTICE CJI, G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan B.P. Achala Anand vs S. Appi Reddy & Anr on 11 February, 2005 Law Point: Right to Residence after Divorce to be decided based on Divorce Terms. JUDGEMENT   Unusual fact situation posing issues for resolution is an opportunity for innovation. Law, as administered […]

Read More

Bhavana N. Shah Vs. Nitin Chimanlal Shah

Court: BOMBAY HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE A.M. Khanwilkar & A.R. Joshi BHAVANA N. SHAH Vs. NITIN CHIMANLAL SHAH On 21 June 2012 Law Point: False, frivolous and unsubstantiated allegations against husband of having illicit relations with his sisters — No contemporaneous evidence produced by wife to corroborate her version — It was clearly an attempt […]

Read More

Smt. Sona vs Karambir

Court: Punjab-Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE S Saksena Smt. Sona vs Karambir on 15 March, 1995 Law Point: Wife is not able to discharge her marital obligations. Evident that it has become impossible for the Husband to reside with the her. Divorce granted. JUDGEMENT 1. Appellant wife has filed the appeal under Section 28 of […]

Read More

PRAVEEN MEHTA Vs. INDERJIT MEHTA

Court:SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: JUSTICE D.P. Mohapatra & Brijesh Kumar PRAVEEN MEHTA Vs. INDERJIT MEHTA On 11 July 2002 Law Point: Denial of sexual intercourse amounts to cruelty. JUDGEMENT   1. What is the meaning and import of the expression ‘cruelty’ as a matrimonial offence is the core question on the determination of which […]

Read More

Som Dutt vs Raj Kumari

Court: Punjab-Haryana High Court Som Dutt vs Raj Kumari on 7 October, 1985 Equivalent citations: AIR 1986 P H 191 Law Point: Concealment of wife’s age and medical history Bench: S Sodhi JUDGMENT 1. A short stay together and long continuing litigation thereafter is what marks the marriage here. It was a marriage conceived in […]

Read More

Parshotam Lal verus Surjeet Kaur

Court: HIGH COURT OF DELHI Bench: JUSTICE O.P.DWIVEDI Parshotam Lal vs Surjeet Kaur on 12/2/2008 Law Point: 6 Month waiting Period waiver in mutual divorce JUDGEMENT Decree of divorce granted by the Trial Court by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act is under challenge in the present appeal. Brief facts for […]

Read More