Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

S. Vijaya & Ors. Vs. S. Dharmaraju & Anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE T. Ranga Rao S. Vijaya & Ors. Vs. S. Dharmaraju & Anr. On 16 October 1997 Law Point: In absence of any specific direction to pay maintenance from date of order or application, It should be construed that payment of maintenance is from date of order in view […]

Read More

Basappa @ Basanagowda Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: JUSTICE N.S. Veerabhadraiah Basappa @ Basanagowda Vs. State Of Karnataka On 28 October 2005 Law Point: Accused Husband and complainant Wife amicably settled matter and filed application under Section 320(6), Cr. P.C. Both submitted to have no differences and having two small kids, not appropriate for this Court to send […]

Read More

Pinki Das (sarkar) Vs. Swapan Sarkar

Court: Gauhati High Court Bench: JUSTICE S. Talapatra Pinki Das (sarkar) Vs. Swapan Sarkar On 23 April 2012 Law Point: “Without reasonable excuse”. Clause as engrafted in Section 9, H.M. Act, 1955 and clause “without any sufficient reason” as engrafted in Section 125(4), Cr.P.C., do carry identical meaning and purport but situations or contexts are […]

Read More

Rathina Marie Prema & Anr. Vs. Marcel Fernandos

Court: Madras High Court Bench: JUSTICE M. Karpagavinayagam Rathina Marie Prema & Anr. Vs. Marcel Fernandos On 8 November 1996 Law Point: Divorce between Husband and Wife on the basis of joint memo, wherein the wife had waived her claim for maintenance. Wife not entitled to claim maintenance unless order in divorce is set aside […]

Read More

Syed Mohd. Ghouse Vs. Noorunnisa Begum & Ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE T. Ch. Surya Rao Syed Mohd. Ghouse Vs. Noorunnisa Begum & Ors. On 14 March 2001 Law Point: Court cannot Compel Person to Give Sample of Blood for DNA or Other Test, if that person refuses to give blood sample without any valid reason, Court is at liberty […]

Read More

S.T. Prabhakar Vs. Secretary Of Government Home Department, Fort St. George & Ors.

Court: Madras High Court Bench: JUSTICE D. Sreedevi S.T. Prabhakar Vs. Secretary Of Government Home Department, Fort St. George & Ors. Law Point: Distress warrant for realisation of maintenance amount to be issued only when the defaulter has failed to comply to the order without sufficient cause. JUDGEMENT 1. Seeking compensation to the tune of […]

Read More

Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs. Kamlesh Kumari & Anr.

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: JUSTICE Surendra Kumar Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs. Kamlesh Kumari & Anr. On 17 January 2012 Law Point: Magistrate is fully competent to recover the maintenance amount remaining unpaid from husband and to pay the same to wife. — Magistrate is directed to issue recovery warrant for maintenance amount remaining unpaid […]

Read More

Salam Vs. Ayisha & Anr.

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE R. Basant Salam Vs. Ayisha & Anr. On 4 December 2006 Law Point: Dispute regarding paternity — DNA test answered against petitioner — Claimant submitted she has no further evidence — Learned Counsel for petitioner submits petitioner wants evidence to be adduced — Even assuming erroneous submission made before […]

Read More

Jaivir Vs. Santosh

Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE V.K. Bali Jaivir Vs. Santosh On 14 February 1995 Law Point: Default in paying maintenance allowance — Warrant of arrest cannot be issued as a matter of first resort — Resort prior in point of time, has to be made to attach property. JUDGEMENT It is true […]

Read More

C. Subramanyam Vs. C. Sumathi & Anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICES Bilal Nazki & K.C. Bhanu C. Subramanyam Vs. C. Sumathi & Anr. On 17 October 2003 Law Point: Magistrate has no power to dismiss petition under Section 125, Cr.P.C. for default : For any reason, if it is dismissed, said Court will become functus officio : It has […]

Read More