Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.
CONSULTATION
Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Gaur Vikas Shukla vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & on 20 November, 2014 Law Point: Electronic record only admissible in evidence when it was in accordance with procedure prescribed under section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 JUDGEMENT 1. In the above captioned two petitions, the challenge is […]
Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICES Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice mukta Gupta Raj Kumar vs State on 19 April, 2016 Law Point: Mobile Phone used as a camera, containing material photograph admitted without certificate u/s Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act, falls under primary evidence. JUDGEMENT 1. Battered and tormented, Gudia has been held to have suffered a […]
Court: Supreme Court Of India Bench: Justice Prafulla C. Pant Shamsher Singh Verma vs State Of Haryana on 24 November 2015 Law Point: Compact Disc (CD) is a Document and can be admitted in Evidence JUDGEMENT This appeal is directed against order dated 25.8.2015, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, whereby […]
Court: High Court Of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Manmohan Singh S.K. Saini & Anr vs C.B.I. on 19 August, 2015 Law Point: Audio, Video not submitted with certificate u/s 65B of Indian Evidence Act, inadmissible and cannot be relied upon JUDGEMENT 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374 Cr.P.C. for setting […]
Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Gaur Vikas Shukla vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & on 20 November, 2014 Law Point: Electronic record only admissible in evidence when it was in accordance with procedure prescribed under section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 JUDGEMENT 1. In the above captioned two petitions, the challenge is […]
Court: High Court Of Delhi Bench: JUSTICES Sanjiv Khanna and Justice R.K.gauba Kundan Singh vs The State on 24 November, 2015 Law Point: Provision under 22A of Indian Evidence Act to be only used when genuineness of electronic evidence is in question. CDRs used for Conviction. JUDGEMENT 1. In this appeal, Kundan Singh challenges judgment dated 18th […]
Court: Andhra High Court Equivalent citations: AIR 2008 AP 98, 2008 (2) ALD 311, 2008 (1) ALT 613 Bench: Justice B Nazki Rayala M. Bhuvaneswari vs Nagaphanender Rayala on 20 December, 2007 Law Point: Recording of private conversation between husband and wife infringement of Article 21 JUDGEMENT 1. After this revision was entertained, this Court, on […]
Court: Madras High Court Bench: JUSTICE A. Kulasekaran G. Shyamala Ranjini vs M.S. Tamizhnathan on 20 November 2007 Law Point: Admissibility of recording of mobile phone conversation on CD. Best evidence rule JUDGEMENT The respondent in HMOP No. 96 of 2004 on the file of Sub Court, Mettur, is the revision petitioner herein. The said HMOP […]
Court: Delhi High Court Bench: S. MURALIDHAR and I.S.MEHTA X vs Z on 11 June, 2015 Law Point: HC issues directions to the Family Courts in Delhi in regards to the evidence which is senstive in nature and likely to affect right of privacy. JUDGEMENT 1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application is […]
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Chief Justice, Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman Anvar P.V vs P.K.Basheer & Ors on 18 September, 2014 Law Point: Secondary evidence pertaining to electronic record is inadmissible if not accompanied with certificate in terms of Section 65B of Evidence Act. JUDGEMENT Construction by plaintiff, destruction by defendant. Construction by […]