Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

quash

Unnikrishnan Vs. Latha

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE R. BASANT Unnikrishnan vs Latha on 30 July, 2007 SRI.P.SHAIJAN JOSEPH, Adv. For the appellant. Mr. Sunny Xavier, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Harmonious settlement of the disputes between the spouses can be accepted and proceedings in 498A can be quashed JUDGEMENT The petitioners are accused in a crime registered, inter alia, under Sec.498A of the IPC. The […]

Read More

J. Om Prakash Vs. State Of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan High Court Equivalent citations: 1988 (1) WLN 510 Bench: JUSTICE N KASLIWAL J. Om Prakash vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 February, 1988 Law Point: Sections 302, 306, 498 A and False accusation quashed. Accused not present at the crime scene JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner by this petition under Section 482, Cr. PC, […]

Read More

State of U.P. Now State of Uttarakhand Vs. Nishikant

Court: High Court Of Uttarakhand Bench: JUSTICE NIRMAL YADAV State vs Nishikant on 16 July, 2010 Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for State, For the appellant. Mr. Vivek Shukla, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Misuse of dowry laws to implicate the husband and family JUDGEMENT This appeal has been preferred by the State of Uttarakhand challenging the judgment dated 30.08.1996 vide which […]

Read More

Smt. Sangeeta Kalra versus State

Court: Delhi High Court Equivalent citations: 138 (2007) DLT 535 Bench: JUSTICE S N Dhingra Smt. Sangeeta Kalra vs State on 2 March, 2007 Law Point: 498A quashed against sister-in-law on basis of letter written by wife to husband JUDGEMENT 1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. for quashing of FIR No. […]

Read More

Moolavalappil Shukoor versus State Of Kerala

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE R. BASANT Moolavalappil Shukoor vs State Of Kerala on 8 January, 2007 SRI.V.RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR, Adv. For the appellant. Public Prosecutor For the respondent. Law Point: Charges of 376 quashed against father and brother, 498A trial to continue against husband JUDGEMENT The petitioners are accused 1 to 3 in a prosecution interalia under Sections 498A and Section 376 […]

Read More

Amit Sharma Vs. State & Ors

Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA Amit Sharma Vs. State & Ors. on 6 August, 2010 Mr. R.S. Kela, Adv. For the appellant. Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State Mr. R.K. Pandhi, Advocate for R-2  Law Point: LOC and FIR quashed in NRI case JUDGEMENT 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Article […]

Read More

Gopal Vs. State Of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma Gopal vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 February, 2009 Law Point: 498 A (a) and (b) explained by SC. For allegations of 498A(b) to suffice, there must be evidence for demand of dowry. JUDGEMENT 1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a […]

Read More

Sudha Vs. Narender Nagpal and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE SABINA Sudha vs Narender Nagpal And Others on 9 February, 2010 Mr.Ashish Handa, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.R.S.Sihota, Adv. and Mr.B.S.Rana,Adv. For the respondents. Law Point: Generic complaint, conduct of accused, money demanded for repayment of loan amout for car after husband lost job cannont be termed as dowry JUDGEMENT Petitioner Sudha has filed […]

Read More

Nagararajan Vs. State Rep

Court: Madras High Court Bench: JUSTICE K.N. BASHA Nagararajan vs State Rep. By on 22 July, 2010 Mr.T.V.Krishnakumar, Adv. For the appellant. Mr.J.C.Durairaj, GA For the respondent. Law Point: Seeking for Financial Assistance is not a Dowry JUDGEMENT The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court IV), Chennai dated 18.5.2003 […]

Read More

Arun Kumar Etc Vs. Pinki Rani

The Ratio of This Judgement Has Been OverRuled By SupremeCourt Rupali Devi Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Court: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Equivalent citations: 2003 (1) AWC 344 SC, (2003) 2 CALLT 23 SC Bench: Justice Nirmaljit Kaur Arun Kumar Etc vs Pinki Rani on 26 March, 2010 Mr. M.S. Khaira with Mr. […]

Read More