Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

498a/406

Court Rejects Unclear Allegations in 498A Case

District Court Karnal JUSTICE Sumit Kumar Saini State Versus xxxxxx On 03 January 2015 Law Point: JUDGEMENT 1. The accused is facing trial for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A/323/406/506 of Indian Penal Code. 2. The facts of the prosecution case are that a complaint was received by the police wherein the complainant alleged that […]

Read More

Investigating officer filed chargesheet against all persons including appellants, mechanically — Chargesheet quashed.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: JUSTICES A.K. Sikri & Ashok Bhushan THESIMA BEGAM AND ANR.Vs. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ORS Law Point: Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 498A, 406 — Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 4 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Cruelty […]

Read More

Abhishek Sureka And 3 Ors. Vs The State Of Assam And Anr

Court: Gauhati High Court Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia Abhishek Sureka And 3 Ors. Vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 13 March, 2025 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT 1. Heard Mr. B. Dutta, the learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned […]

Read More

Shailendra Singh Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others

Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Bench: JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Shailendra Singh Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others on 14 February 2018 Law Point: Complainant improved allegations in CrPC 164 Statement and added allegations of SC ST Act etc. Anticipatory Bail granted JUDGEMENT Shri Arubendra Singh Parihar, learned counsel for the appellant. […]

Read More

BINAY KUMAR CHAUHAN VS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Court: DELHI HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Anu Malhotra, J. BINAY KUMAR CHAUHAN VS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) On 12 November 2020 Law Point : Improvements made in FIR, no atrocity as envisaged under SC ST act done in Public View. Anticipatory Bail grated  JUDGEMENT Anu Malhotra, J.—The applicant vide the present petition seeks the grant of anticipatory bail in […]

Read More

K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, Aftab Alam K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa on 22 February, 2013 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, has been filed by the appellant- husband, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 8/11/2006 passed by the Andhra Pradesh […]

Read More

Julmi Devi vs Ravi Kumar

Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court Bench: Justice Deepak Gupta Julmi Devi vs Ravi Kumar on 7 June, 2005 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT 1. This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act has been filed by the wife against the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Mandi in Hindu Marriage Petition No. […]

Read More

Varala Bharath Kumar And Another Vs. State Of Telangana And Another

Court: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: JUSTICE Arun Mishra & Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Varala Bharath Kumar And Another Vs. State Of Telangana And Another On 5 September 2017 Law Point: Wife is only citing incidents of unhappiness with her husband, no useful purpose will be served in continuing prosecution against Husband. There is a total […]

Read More

Satish Kumar Bhatia Vs. State

Court: DELHI HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE P.S. Teji Satish Kumar Bhatia Vs. State On 30 March 2017 Law Point: No proof to say that deceased Wife was harassed or meted with cruelty for or in connection with demand of dowry. Husband Acquitted. JUDGEMENT The present appeal has been filed under Section 374, Cr.P.C. against judgment […]

Read More

Kunaldev Singh Rathore @ Kunal Dev Vs. State Of M.P

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE J.B. Garg PARMANAND MISHRA Vs. REKHA MISHRA On 13 May 1994 Law Point: Defence documents May Be Examined At Preliminary Stage, If Needed. Under Section 482 CrPC the court is free to consider material that may be produced on behalf of the accused to arrive at a decision […]

Read More