Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

Nischal Chandak Versus State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court JUSTICE Sanjay Kumar Singh, J. Nischal Chandak Versus State of U.P. On 11 March 2025 Law Point:  Bail granted where both parties are adults, suggesting consensual act; no prior criminal record or evidence tampering risk found. JUDGEMENT 1. Heard Mr. Vinay Saran, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Balbir Singh, learned counsel […]

Read More

Arun Kumar Mishra Versus State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court JUSTICE Krishan Pahal,J. Arun Kumar Mishra Versus State of U.P. On 09 April 2025 Law Point: JUDGEMENT 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Anup Triwedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Nitin Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Devendra Singh, learned counsel for the informant as well […]

Read More

Smt. Garima And 5 Others Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another

Allahabad High Court JUSTICE Alok Mathur,J. Smt. Garima And 5 Others Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another On 04 April 2025 Law Point: Mother-in-law can file complaint under DV Act if she lived in shared household and faced domestic violence from daughter-in-law. JUDGEMENT 1. Heard Shri Sushildendra Kumar Sahu, learned counsel […]

Read More

Court Rejects Unclear Allegations in 498A Case

District Court Karnal JUSTICE Sumit Kumar Saini State Versus xxxxxx On 03 January 2015 Law Point:  Vague, uncorroborated allegations without specific evidence or dates cannot sustain conviction under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, and 506 IPC. JUDGEMENT 1. The accused is facing trial for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A/323/406/506 of Indian Penal Code. 2. The […]

Read More

POCSO Acquittal as Evidence of Child Victim was Result of Tutoring

DELHI HIGH COURT JUSTICE VINOD YADAV State Vs. Sohan Lal @ Sonu On 9 April 2015 Law Point: Evidence of child victim should not be result of tutoring – Highly unsafe to convict the accused merely on the basis of her evidence – Benefit of doubt is accorded to the accused & stands acquitted of […]

Read More

Prasanna Sankaranarayanan vs State

Court: Madras High Court Bench: Justice G.K. ilanthiraiyan Prasanna Sankaranarayanan vs State on 27 March, 2025 Law Point: Court held police must follow due process, issue written summons, avoid harassment, and adhere to Lalita Kumari guidelines during enquiry. JUDGEMENT 1. This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent police not to harass […]

Read More

Akshay Manoj Jaisinghani vs The State Of Maharashtra

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: Dr. Shalini Phansalkar joshi, J. Akshay Manoj Jaisinghani vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 December, 2017 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent of learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. 2. This Writ Petition is preferred against […]

Read More

False Allegations Rejected by Court – Judgement

Court: High Court Of Orissa At Cuttack Bench: Hon’ble Chittaranjan Dash, J xxxxx vs xxxxx on 19 March, 2025 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT 1. By means of this appeal, the Appellant has challenged the joint judgment dated 07.08.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack, granting the dissolution of marriage subject to payment of Rs.63,00,000/- […]

Read More

Lalit Mohan vs Tripta Devi

Court: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Bench: R.P. Sethi, J. Lalit Mohan vs Tripta Devi on 15 September, 1988 Law Point: Divorce granted for cruelty and desertion; condonation must be proven. Maintenance can be awarded to either indigent spouse under law. JUDGEMENT 1. Leading cruelty and desertion the respondent-wife sought theq dissolution of marriage by a […]

Read More

Dr. E. Shanthi vs Dr. H.K. Vasudev

Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: K.L. Manjunath, J. Dr. E. Shanthi vs Dr. H.K. Vasudev on 22 August, 2005 Law Point: Qualified spouse capable of earning isn’t entitled to interim maintenance under Section 24; however, child maintenance remains the father’s obligation. JUDGEMENT 1. Petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Both of them are Doctors by […]

Read More