Court: Karnataka High Court
Bench: JUSTICE N.S. Veerabhadraiah
Basappa @ Basanagowda Vs. State Of Karnataka On 28 October 2005
Law Point:
Accused Husband and complainant Wife amicably settled matter and filed application under Section 320(6), Cr. P.C. Both submitted to have no differences and having two small kids, not appropriate for this Court to send accused behind bars.
JUDGEMENT
1. This revision is by the accused being aggrieved of the judgment in Crl. A. No. 111/2003 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-II, Mysore allowing the appeal in part by modifying the sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months as against the judgment in CC No. 820/2000 on the file of the JMFC, II Court, Mysore dated 31.7.2003 convicting the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code.
2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:
The accused was tried for the offence punishable under Section 498-
A and for the offence punishable under Section 506 of Indian Penal Code. The learned JMFC, II Court, Mysore recorded a finding of guilt of the accused for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of Indian Penal Code and further sentencing him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 for the offence punishable under Section 506 of Indian Penal Code. The said conviction and sentence was questioned in Crl. A. No. 111/2003. The learned Judge of the Fast Track Court by reappreciating the testimony of the prosecution witnesses though it was submitted that the parties have entered into a compromise having confirmed the conviction reduced the sentence of one year to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. It is this order, which is questioned in the present criminal revision petition.
3. When the matter came up for admission, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the respondent submitted that the accused-petitioner Basappa and his wife-complainant Nagamma in person and reports that they have amicably settled the matter and also files an application under Section 320(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
4. Learned Counsel for both sides rely on the judgment in the case of B.S. Joshi and Others v. State of Haryana and Another, I (2003) DMC 524 (SC)=II (2003) SLT 689=II (2003) CCR 57 (SC)=ILR 2003 Kar. 1785, and submits that in matrimonial dispute, it is open for the High Court to exercise inherent powers and to permit the parties to compound the offence.
5. In the present case, Section 498-A is not incorporated under Section 320, Clause (1) or under Clause (2). But whereas the State amendment of Andhra Pradesh in their State amendment of Section 498-A is compoundable under Section 320 Sub-section 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Though it is in the Andhra Pradesh State amendment, keeping in mind the decision rendered by the Apex Court in ILR 2003 KAR 1785 when the husband and wife having appeared before this Court and having submitted that they have no difference and they having two small male kids, it is not appropriate for this Court to send the accused behind the bars when it is purely a matrimonial dispute. Taking into consideration the facts of this case and the submissions made by the accused and his wife, I feel that it is a fit case to permit the parties to compound the offence so that they can lead a happy married life without giving any room for further dispute.
6. For the foregoing reasons, this criminal revision petition is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed by the learned JMFC for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code and the sentence passed thereon and the judgment of the First Appellate Court are hereby set aside in view of the fact that the parties have compounded the offence. Accordingly the application is allowed and the accused-petitioner is acquitted of the charges under Sections 498-A and 506 of Indian Penal Code. The application filed shall form part and parcel of the records.
Cr. R.P. allowed.
DISCLAIMER: The above judgement is posted for informational purpose ONLY. Printout/ Copy from this website are not admissible citation in the Court of Law. For a court admissible copy contact your advocate.
You may contact me for consultation or advice by visiting Contact Us
Leave A Comment