Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Archive for Shonee Kapoor

Success Story – Discharge in 498a By Batala Court, Punjab

One of our warriors was charged with 498a in Batala, Punjab, which was false and frivolous. The husband decided to contest it as he was innocent and not willing to be harassed.   You may contact me for your specific case by visiting Contact Us  

Read More

Success Story – TEP Information Allowed To Husband In CIC Decision

One of our warrior Mr. XXXX (name not revealed on request) had filed a TEP at Delhi as the opposite side had claimed exorbitant amount of money spent on marriage and as istridhan. After filing the TEP the Income Tax Department was reluctant and denied sharing information and the outcome of the TEP and had […]

Read More

Qualified Wife Sitting Idle should not Get Maintenance

Madhya Pradesh High Court JUSTICE J.G. Chitre Smt. Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Rajesh Jaiswal On 24 March 2000 Law Point: Not Meant for Supporting Idle (Qualified) Spouses Waiting for ‘Dole’ to be Awarded by Her Husband — Section 24 has been enacted for purpose of providing monetary assistance to such spouse who is incapable of supporting […]

Read More

Unilateral Decision of Wife not to have Child is Cruelty to Husband

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JUSTICE B.N. Agrawal, P.P. Naolekar & Dalveer Bhandari Samar Ghosh Vs. Jaya Ghosh On 26 March 2007 Law Point: She unilaterally declared her decision not to give birth to child for 2 years and appellant should not be inquisitive about her child and keep himself aloof as far as possible — […]

Read More

Respondent Wife not aggrieved person; no relief under Domestic Violence Act

BOMBAY HIGH COURT JUSTICE M.L. Tahaliyani DEEPAK @ GAJANAN RAMRAO KANEGAONKAR Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.                  On 1 July 2015 Law Point: Respondent No. 2-wife knew that applicant was married person and had children from his first wife — Respondent No. 2 was not “aggrieved person” […]

Read More

No Maintenance to Wife if RCR Decree in Favor of Husband

BOMBAY HIGH COURT JUSTICE A.V. Savant & S.S. Parkar Bhagwan Raoji Dale Vs. Sushma @ Nanda Bhawan Dale & Anr. On 18 April 1998 Law Point: Wife, Divorcee : Extended Definition of Word ‘Wife’ Cannot Be Claimed — Wife withdrew herself from society of her husband without any reasonable cause and without consent of her […]

Read More

Income of Wife to be Taken in Account While Determining Maintenance

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JUSTICE Y. V. Chandrachud, R. S. Sarkaria And A. C. Gupta Bhagwan Dutt Vs. Kamla Devi & Anr. On 7 October 1974 Law Point: Separate Income of Wife can be taken into Account in determining the amount of maintenance payable to her. JUDGEMENT 1. Can the income of the wife be […]

Read More

Abhishek Sureka And 3 Ors. Vs The State Of Assam And Anr

Court: Gauhati High Court Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia Abhishek Sureka And 3 Ors. Vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 13 March, 2025 Law Point: High Court’s inherent power under Section 482 CrPC can quash proceedings if allegations are baseless, abusive, or unjust. JUDGEMENT 1. Heard Mr. B. Dutta, the learned senior counsel […]

Read More

Gauhati High Court Crushes Another False 498A Case – A Big Win for Innocent Men

Summary In yet another landmark decision against legal terrorism, the Gauhati High Court quashed a blatantly false 498A case filed by a vindictive wife. The court saw through her fabricated accusations, ruled that mere suspicion is not evidence, and rescued the husband and his family from years of legal harassment. This judgment exposes the rampant […]

Read More

Madras High Court Denies Divorce Despite Clear Grounds of Cruelty – Judgement

Court: Madras High Court Bench: Honourable Mr.justice G.R.Swaminathan And Honourable Ms.justice R.Poornima xxxxx vs xxxxx on 19 March, 2025 Law Point: Private acts like watching porn or masturbation don’t constitute cruelty; venereal disease allegations need strict medical proof for divorce under law. JUDGEMENT The marriage between xxxxx and xxxxx was solemnized on 01.07.2018 at Arulmighu Pasupatheeswara […]

Read More