Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Archive for Shonee Kapoor

State vs Abhinandan Kumar

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE  G.S.SISTANI, J. State vs Abhinandan Kumar on 15 May 2017 Law Point: Leave to appeal dismissed; no error found in acquittal. Victim’s testimony unreliable, lacked corroboration. No strong grounds to interfere. JUDGEMENT 1. This is an application seeking condonation of 76 days delay in filing the present leave to appeal. […]

Read More

Biju N.v. Vs State Of Kerala

Court: HIGH COURT OF KERALA Bench: JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS Biju N.v. Vs State Of Kerala on 29 May 2019 Law Point: Consensual relationship under false marriage promise may allow anticipatory bail despite SC/ST Act bar, if custodial interrogation isn’t needed. JUDGEMENT 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 23.2.2019 rendered by the Special […]

Read More

Dr. Nitin Bhargav vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE S.K. AWASTHI Dr. Nitin Bhargav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 February, 2019 Law Point: Anticipatory bail granted as SC/ST Act bar not attracted; prosecutrix was consenting adult; delay in FIR noted. JUDGEMENT Heard. This appeal under section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention […]

Read More

Atul Kewat Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Bench: JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Atul Kewat Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 04 October 2019 Law Point: Anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act allowed when no prima facie case exists or complaint appears mala fide upon judicial scrutiny. JUDGEMENT Shri Siddharth Datt, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Rajmani […]

Read More

Yogesh Pawar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another

Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Bench: Justice Subodh Abhyankar Yogesh Pawar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another on 21 June 2018 Law Point: Anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act is permissible if prima facie no bar under Section 18 is attracted per evidence. JUDGEMENT 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant under Section […]

Read More

Shailendra Singh Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others

Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Bench: JUSTICE AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Shailendra Singh Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others on 14 February 2018 Law Point: Complainant improved allegations in CrPC 164 Statement and added allegations of SC ST Act etc. Anticipatory Bail granted JUDGEMENT Shri Arubendra Singh Parihar, learned counsel for the appellant. […]

Read More

Amit Patel Vs. State of M.P. and another

Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH Bench: JUSTICE C.V. Sirpurkar Amit Patel Vs. State of M.P. and another on 9 March 2018 Law Point: No specific allegations about SC AT Act, Physical relations established with consent. Anticipatory Bail granted to Accused  JUDGEMENT Shri Anil Khare, senior counsel with Shri Jasneet Singh Hora, counsel for the appellant. Shri […]

Read More

Pratikkumar Rajeshbhai Patel Vs State Of Gujarat

Court: HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Bench: JUSTICE S.H.VORA Pratikkumar Rajeshbhai Patel Vs State Of Gujarat on 24 January 2019 Law Point:  Anticipatory bail granted under SC/ST Act when prima facie bar under Section 18 not attracted and investigation substantially completed. JUDGEMENT 1. Admit. Learned A.P.P. Mr.Pranav Trivedi and learned advocate Ms.S.M. Rana waive service of […]

Read More

BINAY KUMAR CHAUHAN VS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Court: DELHI HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Anu Malhotra, J. BINAY KUMAR CHAUHAN VS. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) On 12 November 2020 Law Point : Improvements made in FIR, no atrocity as envisaged under SC ST act done in Public View. Anticipatory Bail grated  JUDGEMENT Anu Malhotra, J.—The applicant vide the present petition seeks the grant of anticipatory bail in […]

Read More

Big Win for Men: Court Says Earning Wives Can’t Demand Maintenance!

Summary The Allahabad High Court ruled that an earning wife cannot claim maintenance from her husband. The court made it clear—men are not ATM machines and should not be forced to pay maintenance when the wife is fully capable of supporting herself. This is a huge victory for men, as it stops financially independent women […]

Read More