Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Archive for Shonee Kapoor

Sindhu Paul and Ors. Vs. State of Kerala and Ors.

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE Raja Vijayaraghavan V Sindhu Paul and Ors. vs. State of Kerala and Ors. On 13 Novenber 2017 Law Point: Abetment to suicide – In order to convict person u/s 306 IPC, there has to be clear mens rea to commit offence and that there ought to be active or […]

Read More

State Govt. of NCT of Delhi Vs. Ram Gopal

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICES Vipin Sanghi and P.S. Teji State Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Ram Gopal On 01 November 2017 Law Point: Cruelty – Dory Death – It is necessary to establish offence u/s 498-A IPC to prove charges u/s 304-B IPC. JUDGEMENT 1. The State has filed the application under […]

Read More

Mohammed Sharif Vs. Raisa Begum and Another

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE Sharad Manohar Mohammed Sharif Vs. Raisa Begum and Another On 26 July 1985 Law Point: Wife not entitled to maintenance as she was in wrong as all efforts to reconcile proved futile by the husband. JUDGEMENT 1. A question of quite some importance is raised by Mr. Kadar in […]

Read More

Mohd Babu@Sameer Vs. Shakila

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE SUNIL GAURE Mohd Babu@Sameer vs Shakila On 21 April 2015 Law Point: Settlement is comprehensive. It clearly stipulated that parties will not initiate any action against each other. Maintenance denied to wife. JUDGEMENT In proceedings under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. petitioner had raised the question of maintainability, which has […]

Read More

Kamal Vs. Km. Ahilya And Others

Court: Allahabad High Court Bench: JUSTICES N.L. Ganguley & B. Dikshit Kamal Vs. Km. Ahilya And Others On 20 November 1991 Law Point: Application for maintenance of minor children u/Sec. 125 Cr. P.C. — Allowed by Family Court — Challenged on ground that he is not father of the children and denial of marriage relationship […]

Read More

Pushpa Datt Mishra vs. Smt. Archana Mishra alias Premvati Choubey

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE D.M. Dharmadhikari Pushpa Datt Mishra vs. Smt. Archana Mishra alias Premvati Choubey On 08 May 1991 Law Point: Reckless allegation of wife in her pleadings and in her testimony before Court alleging adultery against husband furnishes a ground to grant a decree of divorce in favour of husband […]

Read More

State Of Maharashtra Vs. Vasant Kumar

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE A.P. Bhangale State Of Maharashtra Vs. Vasant Kumar On 17 February 2012 Law Point: Sections 306, 498A – Abetment of Suicide — Cruelty — Dying declaration — Not reliable — Dying declaration in question does not spell out offence punishable under Section 306 and Section 498A, IPC.     […]

Read More

Anandi Devi Vs. Komal Kumar

Court: Uttarakhand High Court Bench: JUSTICE Prafulla C. Pant & Sudhanshu Dhulia Anandi Devi Vs. Komal Kumar On 2 December 2010 Law Point: Wife made no attempt to come back to her husband’s house nor tried to contact him over phone — Husband has sufficiently proved on record that he was subjected to cruelty by […]

Read More

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sham Lal

Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE Sanjay Karol and Ajay Mohan Goel State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Sham Lal On 12 April 2017 Law Point: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – Glaring inconsistencies found in statement of prosecutrix and her mother about occurence of alleged incident, which has not satisfactorily explained […]

Read More

LALIT SINGH Vs. RAJ KUMARI

Court: CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Pritinker Diwaker & R.C.S. Samant LALIT SINGH Vs. RAJ KUMARI On 3 July 2017 Law Point: Irretrievable breakdown of marriages — Compromise between parties. Waiting for period of 6 months not mandatory — Divorce by mutual consent granted.     JUDGEMENT   This appeal has been preferred against the […]

Read More